Literature DB >> 1561293

The potential efficiency of routine HIV testing of hospital patients--data from a CDC sentinel hospital.

K Henry1, S Campbell.   

Abstract

St. Paul-Ramsey Medical Center is a member of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Sentinel Hospital Surveillance Group. The authors have modified the surveillance group's protocol in order to calculate what percentage of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected samples identified came from persons known by them to be HIV infected. All identifiers are still unlinked from the sample before testing for HIV. After 24 months, the HIV seroprevalence was 0.96 percent and the estimated cost of identifying a "new" seropositive at this site is $4,530 to $9,060. This range is a cost estimate; a typical laboratory charge for the HIV ELISA screen, if applied to such a testing program, would considerably increase this estimate. Modifications to the protocol design that would target patients in certain demographic groups (for example, men ages 15 to 44 years) or HIV-associated diseases might improve efficiency but could miss a significant number of HIV-infected patients. The efficiency of hospital-based HIV testing would likely decline after several years of practice. Although there are significant ethical problems with programs attempting routine hospital-based HIV testing, pilot testing may merit consideration in areas where the HIV-1 seroprevalence is greater than 1 percent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1561293      PMCID: PMC1403621     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  8 in total

1.  Hospital-based routine HIV testing programs.

Authors:  F S Rhame
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Hospital policies on HIV antibody testing.

Authors:  T C Eickhoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Nondonor HIV antibody testing in Minnesota.

Authors:  K Henry; R J Bowman; H F Polesky; M T Osterholm; R J Brown
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The case for wider use of testing for HIV infection.

Authors:  F S Rhame; D G Maki
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-05-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Human immunodeficiency virus antibody testing. A description of practices and policies at US infectious disease-teaching hospitals and Minnesota hospitals.

Authors:  K Henry; K Willenbring; K Crossley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Evaluation of a hospital admission HIV antibody voluntary screening program.

Authors:  R L Harris; E V Boisaubin; P D Salyer; D F Semands
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 3.254

7.  Seroprevalence rates of human immunodeficiency virus infection at sentinel hospitals in the United States. The Sentinel Hospital Surveillance Group.

Authors:  M E St Louis; K J Rauch; L R Petersen; J E Anderson; C A Schable; T J Dondero
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Analysis of the use of HIV antibody testing in a Minnesota hospital.

Authors:  K Henry; M Maki; K Crossley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-01-08       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Assessing the Reliability of Performing Citywide Chronic Disease Surveillance Using Emergency Department Data from Sentinel Hospitals.

Authors:  David C Lee; Jordan L Swartz; Christian A Koziatek; Andrew J Vinson; Jessica K Athens; Stella S Yi
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 2.459

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.