Literature DB >> 15612275

Possible effects of (trans)gene flow from crops on the genetic diversity from landraces and wild relatives.

Paul Gepts1, Roberto Papa.   

Abstract

Gene flow is a potential concern associated with the use of transgenic crops because it could affect genetic diversity of related landraces and wild relatives. This concern has taken on added importance with the looming introduction of transgenic crops in centers of crop domestication (Mexico, China) and those producing pharmaceutical compounds. For gene flow to take place among cultivars and their wild relatives, several steps have to be fulfilled, including the presence of cultivars or wild relatives within pollen or seed dispersal range, the ability to produce viable and fertile hybrids, at least partial overlap in flowering time, actual gene flow by pollen or seed, and the establishment of crop genes in the domesticated or wild recipient populations. In contrast with domestication genes, which often make crops less adapted to natural ecosystems, transgenes frequently represent gains of function, which might release wild relatives from constraints that limit their fitness. In most sexually reproducing organisms, the chromosomal region affected by selection of a single gene amounts to a small percentage of the total genome size. Because of gene flow, the level of genetic diversity present in the domesticated gene pool becomes a crucial factor affecting the genetic diversity of the wild gene pool. For some crops, such as cotton and maize, the introduction of transgenic technologies has led to a consolidation of the seed industry and a reduction in the diversity of the elite crop gene pool. Thus, diversity in improved varieties grown by farmers needs to be monitored. Several areas deserve further study, such as the actual magnitude of gene flow and its determinants in different agroecosystems, the long-term effects of gene flow on genetic diversity both across gene pools and within genomes, the expression of transgenes in new genetic backgrounds, and the effects of socio-economic factors on genetic diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15612275     DOI: 10.1051/ebr:2003009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res        ISSN: 1635-7922


  22 in total

1.  Who owns biodiversity, and how should the owners be compensated?

Authors:  Paul Gepts
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 2.  Transgenic maize and the evolution of landrace diversity in Mexico. The importance of farmers' behavior.

Authors:  Mauricio R Bellon; Julien Berthaud
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Biofortified sorghum in Africa: using problem formulation to inform risk assessment.

Authors:  Karen E Hokanson; Norman C Ellstrand; Jeremy T Ouedraogo; Patrick A Olweny; Barbara A Schaal; Alan F Raybould
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Gene flow from herbicide-tolerant GM rice and the heterosis of GM rice-weed F2 progeny.

Authors:  Young Jin Chun; Dae In Kim; Kee Woong Park; Hyo-Jeong Kim; Soon-Chun Jeong; Ju Hee An; Kang Hyun Cho; Kyoungwhan Back; Hwan Mook Kim; Chang-Gi Kim
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Genetic diversity, structure, gene flow and evolutionary relationships within the Sorghum bicolor wild-weedy-crop complex in a western African region.

Authors:  Fabrice Sagnard; Monique Deu; Dékoro Dembélé; Raphaël Leblois; Lassana Touré; Mohamed Diakité; Caroline Calatayud; Michel Vaksmann; Sophie Bouchet; Yaya Mallé; Sabine Togola; Pierre C Sibiry Traoré
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Biodiversity only makes sense in the light of evolution.

Authors:  R Geeta; Lucia G Lohmann; Susana Magallon; Daniel P Faith; Andrew Hendry; Keith Crandall; Luc De Meester; Campbell O Webb; Anne-Helene Prieur-Richard; Makiko Mimura; Elena Conti; Joel Cracraft; Felix Forest; Carlos Jaramillo; Michael Donoghue; Tetsukazu Yahara
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Absence of detectable transgenes in local landraces of maize in Oaxaca, Mexico (2003-2004).

Authors:  S Ortiz-García; E Ezcurra; B Schoel; F Acevedo; J Soberón; A A Snow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Seedling development in a Brassica napus diversity set and its relationship to agronomic performance.

Authors:  Niklas Körber; Benjamin Wittkop; Anja Bus; Wolfgang Friedt; Rod J Snowdon; Benjamin Stich
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  Normal expression of insect-resistant transgene in progeny of common wild rice crossed with genetically modified rice: its implication in ecological biosafety assessment.

Authors:  Hui Xia; Bao-Rong Lu; Jun Su; Rui Chen; Jun Rong; Zhiping Song; Feng Wang
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Dispersal of transgenes through maize seed systems in Mexico.

Authors:  George A Dyer; J Antonio Serratos-Hernández; Hugo R Perales; Paul Gepts; Alma Piñeyro-Nelson; Angeles Chávez; Noé Salinas-Arreortua; Antonio Yúnez-Naude; J Edward Taylor; Elena R Alvarez-Buylla
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.