Literature DB >> 15612005

Lens-forming competence in the epidermis of Xenopus laevis during development.

Emiliano Arresta1, Sergio Bernardini, Cesare Gargioli, Sergio Filoni, Stefano M Cannata.   

Abstract

In larval X. laevis the capacity to regenerate a lens under the influence of inductive factors present in the vitreous chamber is restricted to the outer cornea and pericorneal epidermis (Lentogenic Area, LA). However, in early embryos, the whole ectoderm is capable of responding to inductive factors of the larval eye forming lens cells. In a previous paper, Cannata et al. (2003) demonstrated that the persistence of lens-forming competence in the LA is the result of early signals causing lens-forming bias in the presumptive LA and of late signals from the eye causing cornea development. This paper analyzes 1) the decrease of the lens-forming capacity in ectodermal regions both near LA (head epidermis) and far from LA (flank epidermis) during development, 2) the capacity of the head epidermis and flank epidermis to respond to lens-competence promoting factors released by an eye transplanted below these epidermal regions, and 3) the eye components responsible for the promoting effect of the transplanted eye. Results were obtained by implanting fragments of ectoderm or epidermis into the vitreous chamber of host tadpoles and by evaluating the percentage of implants positive to a monoclonal antibody anti-lens. These results demonstrated that the lens-forming competence in the flank region is lost at the embryonic stage 30/31 and is weakly restored by eye transplantation; however, lens-forming competence in the head region is lost at the larval stage 48 and is strongly restored by eye transplantation. The authors hypothesize that during development the head ectoderm outside the LA is attained by low levels of the same signals that attain the LA and that these signals are responsible for the maintenance of lens-forming competence in the cornea and pericorneal epidermis of the larva. In this hypothesis, low levels of these signals slacken the decrease of the lens-forming competence in the head ectoderm and make the head epidermis much more responsive than the flank epidermis to the effect of promoting factors released by a transplanted eye. Results obtained after transplantation of eyes deprived of some components indicate that the lens and the retina are the main source of these promoting factors. The immunohistochemical detection of the FGFR-2 (bek variant) protein in the epidermis of stage 53 larvae submitted to eye transplantation at stage 46 showed that the eye transplantation increased the level of FGFR-2 protein in the head epidermis but not in the flank epidermis, indicating that the lens-forming competence in X. laevis epidermis could be related to the presence of an activated FGF receptor system in the responding tissue. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15612005     DOI: 10.1002/jez.a.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool A Comp Exp Biol        ISSN: 1548-8969


  10 in total

Review 1.  An essential role for FGF receptor signaling in lens development.

Authors:  Michael L Robinson
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 7.727

Review 2.  Diverse Evolutionary Origins and Mechanisms of Lens Regeneration.

Authors:  Jonathan J Henry; Paul W Hamilton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Expression of pluripotency factors in larval epithelia of the frog Xenopus: evidence for the presence of cornea epithelial stem cells.

Authors:  Kimberly J Perry; Alvin G Thomas; Jonathan J Henry
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2012-12-26       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  FGF signaling is required for lens regeneration in Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Lisa Fukui; Jonathan J Henry
Journal:  Biol Bull       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.818

5.  Molecular and cellular aspects of amphibian lens regeneration.

Authors:  Jonathan J Henry; Panagiotis A Tsonis
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 6.  Setting appropriate boundaries: fate, patterning and competence at the neural plate border.

Authors:  Andrew K Groves; Carole LaBonne
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 3.582

Review 7.  Cell signaling pathways in vertebrate lens regeneration.

Authors:  Jonathan J Henry; Alvin G Thomas; Paul W Hamilton; Lisa Moore; Kimberly J Perry
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.291

8.  Lens regeneration from the cornea requires suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Authors:  Paul W Hamilton; Yu Sun; Jonathan J Henry
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  The optic vesicle promotes cornea to lens transdifferentiation in larval Xenopus laevis.

Authors:  Stefano M Cannata; Sergio Bernardini; Sergio Filoni; Cesare Gargioli
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  The lens-regenerating competence in the outer cornea and epidermis of larval Xenopus laevis is related to pax6 expression.

Authors:  Cesare Gargioli; Vincenzo Giambra; Sara Santoni; Sergio Bernardini; Domenico Frezza; Sergio Filoni; Stefano M Cannata
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.610

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.