Literature DB >> 15611934

Combined dynamic contrast enhanced breast MR and proton spectroscopic imaging: a feasibility study.

Michael A Jacobs1, Peter B Barker, Pedram Argani, Ronald Ouwerkerk, Zaver M Bhujwalla, David A Bluemke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of combined dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) in evaluating breast lesions.
METHODS: Nine patients with positive mammograms scheduled for either biopsy or mastectomy were examined on a 1.5-T MR scanner. DCE was performed with administration of gadolinium-DTPA contrast using a two-dimensional spoiled gradient recall echo (SPGR) sequence. Proton spectroscopy (TR/TE = 2000/272 msec) was performed using PRESS single slice (10 mm). Lesion time intensity curves were classified as persistent (type 1), plateau (type 2), or washout (type 3) pattern enhancement. Choline (Cho) signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and enhancement patterns were compared between benign and malignant lesions as determined by histopathology.
RESULTS: Five patients had breast carcinoma and four had benign lesions. Type 1 enhancement was found in two benign cases, type 2 enhancement in two of four benign and four of five malignant lesions, and one malignant case exhibited a type 3 pattern. Choline SNR was significantly different (P < 0.003) between benign and malignant lesions (2.0 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.7 +/- 1.4; P < 0.003). Choline SNR was less than 4.0 in all of the benign lesions, including the two lesions with type 2 enhancement.
CONCLUSION: Proton MRS appears to be a promising technique for classification of breast lesions when DCE results are equivocal. A combination of DCE and MRS is feasible, and may have improved specificity compared to either modality alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15611934     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  26 in total

1.  The added value of quantitative multi-voxel MR spectroscopy in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C van der Weide Jansen; L Jansen; P Kappert; M Oudkerk; P E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  (1)H MR spectroscopy with external reference solution at 1.5 T for differentiating malignant and benign breast lesions: comparison using qualitative and quantitative approaches.

Authors:  Waka Mizukoshi; Eito Kozawa; Kaiji Inoue; Naoko Saito; Naoko Nishi; Toshiaki Saeki; Fumiko Kimura
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A high spatial resolution 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging technique for breast cancer with a short echo time.

Authors:  Jiani Hu; Yingjian Yu; Zhifeng Kou; Wei Huang; Quan Jiang; Yang Xuan; Tao Li; Vivek Sehgal; Cassann Blake; E Mark Haacke; Renate L Soulen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 4.  Metabolite quantification and high-field MRS in breast cancer.

Authors:  Ihab S Haddadin; Adeka McIntosh; Sina Meisamy; Curt Corum; Angela L Styczynski Snyder; Nathaniel J Powell; Michael T Nelson; Douglas Yee; Michael Garwood; Patrick J Bolan
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Implementation of a semi-automated post-processing system for parametric MRI mapping of human breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert E Lee; E Brian Welch; Jared G Cobb; Tuhin Sinha; John C Gore; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Current Status and New Developments in Breast MRI.

Authors:  Katja C Siegmann; Bernhard Krämer; Claus Claussen
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 7.  The Efficiency of Diffusion Weighted MRI and MR Spectroscopy On Breast MR Imaging.

Authors:  Canan Altay; Pınar Balcı
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy in metabolic and molecular imaging and diagnosis of cancer.

Authors:  Kristine Glunde; Dmitri Artemov; Marie-France Penet; Michael A Jacobs; Zaver M Bhujwalla
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  NMR metabolomics of MTLn3E breast cancer cells identifies a role for CXCR4 in lipid and choline regulation.

Authors:  Louic S Vermeer; Gilbert O Fruhwirth; Pahini Pandya; Tony Ng; A James Mason
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 10.  Multiparametric MR Imaging of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Habib Rahbar; Savannah C Partridge
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.