Literature DB >> 15611904

[Evaluation of the insertion-trauma of the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode-array in a human temporal bone model].

T Klenzner1, B Richter, H Nagursky, J Schipper, R Laszig, A Aschendorff.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of intracochlear electrode arrays is aiming at a placement close to the modiolus with an insertion as atraumatic as possible. A new perimodiolar electrode model the Nucleus Contour Advance was to be evaluated regarding the possible intracochlear trauma.
METHODS: The implantation of the Contour Advance electrode was performed in 11 frozen native temporal bones. Beneath a regular insertion in 5 temporal bones in 6 cases the insertion was carried out using the "advance-off-stylett" technique with a fixed stylett. The temporal bones were embedded in metacrylate based resin for histomorphological evaluation. The evaluation was performed regarding to the intracochlear placement close to the modiolus and the damage to intracochlear fine structures (basilar membrane, osseus spiral lamina).
RESULTS: In 2 out of 11 cases we found a perforation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli independent of the insertion-technique. A severe intracochlear trauma was observed in one case with fracture of osseus spiral lamina using the AOS-technique. A close position to the modiolus could be achieved by insertion the scala tympani without perforation of the basilar membrane.
CONCLUSIONS: The Nucleus Contour Advance electrode array showed minimal trauma in human temporal bones by using a standard insertion technique. By using the freehand AOS-technique a severe cochlear trauma is possible. Therefore further development in electrode design and the use of an insertion-tool is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15611904     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-826067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngorhinootologie        ISSN: 0935-8943            Impact factor:   1.057


  7 in total

1.  [Cochlear implants in isolated temporal bones: evaluation of electrode position with 64-slice computed tomography].

Authors:  J H Wagner; G Rademacher; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  New strategies for high precision surgery of the temporal bone using a robotic approach for cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Thomas Klenzner; Chiu Chun Ngan; Felix Bernhard Knapp; Hayo Knoop; Jan Kromeier; Antje Aschendorff; Evangelos Papastathopoulos; Joerg Raczkowsky; Heinz Wörn; Joerg Schipper
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Insertion results for Contour™ and Contour Advance™ electrodes: are there individual learning curves?].

Authors:  A Aschendorff; T Klenzner; S Arndt; R Beck; C Schild; L Röddiger; W Maier; R Laszig
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Optimal cochlear implant insertion vectors.

Authors:  Xenia Meshik; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole; Timothy E Hullar
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Three-dimensional histological specimen preparation for accurate imaging and spatial reconstruction of the middle and inner ear.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Waldemar Würfel; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  The effect of pulling out cochlear implant electrodes on inner ear microstructures: a temporal bone study.

Authors:  Ingo Todt; Rainer O Seidl; Arne Ernst
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-11

7.  Imaging in cochlear implant patients.

Authors:  Antje Aschendorff
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2012-04-26
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.