Literature DB >> 15611803

User perspectives on issues that influence the quality of daily life of ventilator-assisted individuals with neuromuscular disorders.

Dina Brooks1, Audrey King, Mark Tonack, Helen Simson, Maria Gould, Roger Goldstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify user perspectives on the issues that impact the quality of the daily lives of ventilator-assisted individuals living in the community.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews were held with 26 Canadian ventilator-assisted individuals (mean age 44+/-14 [SD] years, range 23 to 60 years; mean ventilator experience 18+/-13 years, range three to 53 years) whose disability from neuromuscular conditions necessitated assistance with activities of daily living. Participants described their daily life experiences and perceptions of the factors that limited or enhanced their quality. Interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and analyzed for emergent codes and themes.
RESULTS: Ventilator users characterized important issues in terms of personal successes and limitations, as well as dependencies on others for daily living. Personal support services, income security, health care and transportation were important positive contributors to their quality of life. Dependency on others was clearly a negative contributor. The ventilator was regarded as a form of assistive technology, similar to a wheelchair. Ventilator users perceived that ventilation was associated with a stigma and negative assumptions about disability, particularly if suctioning was required.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants considered home mechanical ventilation to be a positive benefit for independent living, enhancing their overall health. They were clear as to the issues of importance to them, and formulated recommendations for health care providers and policy makers that could improve the quality of their daily lives. Many of the issues identified in the present report are faced by the growing community of ventilator users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15611803     DOI: 10.1155/2004/659147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Respir J        ISSN: 1198-2241            Impact factor:   2.409


  6 in total

1.  Intermittent daytime mouthpiece ventilation successfully augments nocturnal non-invasive ventilation, controlling ventilatory failure and maintaining patient independence.

Authors:  Karen Ward; Verity Ford; Helen Ashcroft; Robert Parker
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-09

2.  Twenty-four hour noninvasive ventilation in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a safe alternative to tracheostomy.

Authors:  Doug A McKim; Nadia Griller; Carole LeBlanc; Andrew Woolnough; Judy King
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.409

3.  Family caregiver perspectives on caring for ventilator-assisted individuals at home.

Authors:  Rachel Evans; Michael A Catapano; Dina Brooks; Roger S Goldstein; Monica Avendano
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.409

4.  Survey of financial burden of families in the U.S. with children using home mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Edwards; Howard B Panitch; Andrei Constantinescu; Rachel L Miller; Patricia W Stone
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2017-11-20

5.  Attitudes and preferences of home mechanical ventilation users from four European countries: an ERS/ELF survey.

Authors:  Sarah Masefield; Michele Vitacca; Michael Dreher; Michael Kampelmacher; Joan Escarrabill; Mara Paneroni; Pippa Powell; Nicolino Ambrosino
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2017-06-23

6.  Why does the provision of home mechanical ventilation vary so widely?

Authors:  Knut Dybwik; Terje Tollåli; Erik Waage Nielsen; Berit Støre Brinchmann
Journal:  Chron Respir Dis       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.444

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.