Literature DB >> 15611549

Changes in the emergency workload of the London Ambulance Service between 1989 and 1999.

P J Peacock1, J L Peacock, C R Victor, C Chazot.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine changes in the emergency workload of the London Ambulance Service (LAS) between 1989 and 1999.
METHODS: All emergency responses by the LAS during week 16 in each of 1989, 1996, and 1999 were studied. For each week, 999 call responses were analysed by time and day of call, and age/sex of the patient. Call response rates were calculated using age/sex census population estimates for London. Changes in call rates over time were calculated as rate ratios.
RESULTS: Emergency responses increased from 6624 to 13 178 in the index weeks of 1989-1999. The ratio of response rates (1999/1989) was 1.91 (95% CI: 1.85 to 1.96). The proportion of out of hours calls increased significantly, from 68.8% in 1989 to 71.3% in 1999 (p = 0.0003). Response rates rose significantly more steeply for male patients than female patients from 1989 to 1999: rate ratio (95% CI); male patients 2.00 (1.91 to 2.08), female patients 1.69 (1.62 to 1.77), p<0.0001. Response rates varied by age in each of the three years investigated. Rates were consistently highest for patients aged 75 and above, and lowest for those aged 5-14. However, there was no evidence that call rates had increased disproportionately in any particular age group (p = 0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: Demand for emergency ambulance services in London has doubled in a decade. This increase is similar for all age groups, with no evidence of a greater rise in demand among older people. Call rates have increased more steeply in men than in women. Demographic changes do not explain the observed increases in demand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15611549      PMCID: PMC1726532          DOI: 10.1136/emj.2004.016741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  8 in total

1.  Impact of NHS direct on demand for immediate care: observational study.

Authors:  J Munro; J Nicholl; A O'Cathain; E Knowles
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-15

2.  Trends in demand for emergency ambulance services in Wiltshire over nine years: observational study.

Authors:  Hannah Wrigley; Steve George; Helen Smith; Helen Snooks; Alan Glasper; Eileen Thomas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

Review 3.  Sex, gender, and health: the need for a new approach.

Authors:  L Doyal
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-03

Review 4.  Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances.

Authors:  H Snooks; H Wrigley; S George; E Thomas; H Smith; A Glasper
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1998-07

5.  Relation of out of hours activity by general practice and accident and emergency services with deprivation in Nottingham: longitudinal survey.

Authors:  R Carlisle; L M Groom; A J Avery; D Boot; S Earwicker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-14

6.  Who calls 999 and why? A survey of the emergency workload of the London Ambulance Service.

Authors:  C R Victor; J L Peacock; C Chazot; S Walsh; D Holmes
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-05

7.  The use of out of hours health services: a cross sectional survey.

Authors:  C Brogan; D Pickard; A Gray; S Fairman; A Hill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-14

8.  Changing patterns in accident and emergency attenders.

Authors:  A Wass; N Zoltie
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-07
  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  The Advanced Paramedic Clinical Activity Study (APCAS): an insight into the work of advanced paramedics in the mid-west of Ireland.

Authors:  N M Cummins; C Garavan; M Dixon; E Landymore; N Mulligan; C O'Donnell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Weather and Temporal Factors Associated with Use of Emergency Medical Services.

Authors:  Sriram Ramgopal; Jennifer Dunnick; Sylvia Owusu-Ansah; Nalyn Siripong; David D Salcido; Christian Martin-Gill
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Time consumption for non-conveyed patients within emergency medical services (EMS): A one-year prospective descriptive and comparative study in a region of Sweden.

Authors:  Frida Malm; Annika Elfström; Emma Ohlsson-Nevo; Erik Höglund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multimodal observational assessment of quality and productivity benefits from the implementation of wireless technology for out of hours working.

Authors:  John D Blakey; Debbie Guy; Carl Simpson; Andrew Fearn; Sharon Cannaby; Petra Wilson; Dominick Shaw
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The demographic impact on the demand for emergency medical services in the urban and rural regions of Bavaria, 2012-2032.

Authors:  Alexander Veser; Florian Sieber; Stefan Groß; Stephan Prückner
Journal:  Z Gesundh Wiss       Date:  2015-05-26

6.  Which symptoms pose the highest risk in patients calling for an ambulance? A population-based cohort study from Denmark.

Authors:  Stine Ibsen; Tim Alex Lindskou; Christian H Nickel; Torben Kløjgård; Erika Frischknecht Christensen; Morten Breinholt Søvsø
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Trends and Characteristics of Emergency Medical Services in Italy: A 5-Years Population-Based Registry Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Campagna; Alessio Conti; Valerio Dimonte; Marco Dalmasso; Michele Starnini; Maria Michela Gianino; Alberto Borraccino
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-11

8.  Influence of socioeconomic factors on medically unnecessary ambulance calls.

Authors:  Chihiro Kawakami; Kenji Ohshige; Katsuaki Kubota; Osamu Tochikubo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Factors influencing the decision to convey or not to convey elderly people to the emergency department after emergency ambulance attendance: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Johan Oosterwold; Dennis Sagel; Sivera Berben; Petrie Roodbol; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.