Olli Tenovuo1. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, 20520 Turku, Finland. olli.tenovuo@tyks.fi
Abstract
PURPOSE: Theoretically, central acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (CAIs) could alleviate at least some of the main symptoms of chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this report is to describe clinical experience of the treatment of chronic TBI with these drugs. GENERAL METHODS: From an outpatient clinic material, 111 patients were selected having chronic stable TBI with at least one of the following target symptoms: fatigue, poor memory, diminished attention or diminished initiation. Patients received in random donepezil, galantamine or rivastigmine. The evaluation of the treatment response was based on the subjective view of the patient. FINDINGS: As first treatment, 27 patients receiveddonepezil, 30 galantamine and 54 rivastigmine. Altogether 41 patients tried more than one drug, but only three patients tried all three alternatives. In total, 61% of patients had a marked positive response and 39% a modest or no response. The clearest effect was in almost all responders a better vigilance and attention causing better general function. About half of the patients (55%) wanted to continue therapy with one of these drugs. The therapeutic response became very quickly and at low doses. There were no significant differences between the three drugs either in effect or tolerability. The age, sex, type of injury, severity of TBI or elapsed time after injury did not affect the response. The mean dose in maintenance therapy was 7.2 mg od for donepezil, 5.0 mg bid for galantamine and 2.3 mg bid for rivastigmine. Side effects or inadequate therapeutic response were the main causes for discontinuation with nearly equal frequency. Paradoxical responses were seen in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: CAIs show a very promising therapeutic potential in the treatment of chronic TBI. There were no significant differences between the three drugs. Large-scale randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled studies are clearly needed.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: Theoretically, central acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (CAIs) could alleviate at least some of the main symptoms of chronic traumatic brain injury (TBI). The aim of this report is to describe clinical experience of the treatment of chronic TBI with these drugs. GENERAL METHODS: From an outpatient clinic material, 111 patients were selected having chronic stable TBI with at least one of the following target symptoms: fatigue, poor memory, diminished attention or diminished initiation. Patients received in random donepezil, galantamine or rivastigmine. The evaluation of the treatment response was based on the subjective view of the patient. FINDINGS: As first treatment, 27 patients received donepezil, 30 galantamine and 54 rivastigmine. Altogether 41 patients tried more than one drug, but only three patients tried all three alternatives. In total, 61% of patients had a marked positive response and 39% a modest or no response. The clearest effect was in almost all responders a better vigilance and attention causing better general function. About half of the patients (55%) wanted to continue therapy with one of these drugs. The therapeutic response became very quickly and at low doses. There were no significant differences between the three drugs either in effect or tolerability. The age, sex, type of injury, severity of TBI or elapsed time after injury did not affect the response. The mean dose in maintenance therapy was 7.2 mg od for donepezil, 5.0 mg bid for galantamine and 2.3 mg bid for rivastigmine. Side effects or inadequate therapeutic response were the main causes for discontinuation with nearly equal frequency. Paradoxical responses were seen in some patients. CONCLUSIONS: CAIs show a very promising therapeutic potential in the treatment of chronic TBI. There were no significant differences between the three drugs. Large-scale randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled studies are clearly needed.
Authors: Jing Zhao; Michael J Hylin; Nobuhide Kobori; Kimberly N Hood; Anthony N Moore; Pramod K Dash Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Ihuoma Njoku; Hannah L Radabaugh; Melissa A Nicholas; Lindsay A Kutash; Darik A O'Neil; Ian P Marshall; Jeffrey P Cheng; Anthony E Kline; Corina O Bondi Journal: Exp Neurol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 5.330
Authors: Patricia B de la Tremblaye; Jody L Wellcome; Benjamin Wells de Witt; Jeffrey P Cheng; Elizabeth R Skidmore; Corina O Bondi; Anthony E Kline Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2017-11-12 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Elysa J Marco; Kathryn M Harrell; Warren S Brown; Susanna S Hill; Rita J Jeremy; Joel H Kramer; Elliott H Sherr; Lynn K Paul Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-03-06 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Kaitlyn E Shaw; Corina O Bondi; Samuel H Light; Lire A Massimino; Rose L McAloon; Christina M Monaco; Anthony E Kline Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 5.269