Literature DB >> 15610889

Repair of ventral incisional hernia: the design of a randomized trial to compare open and laparoscopic surgical techniques.

Kamal M F Itani1, Leigh Neumayer, Domenic Reda, Lawrence Kim, Thomas Anthony.   

Abstract

The appearance of incisional hernia after laparotomy closure continues to be an important postoperative complication. Advances in anesthesia techniques, adequate prevention and treatment of infection during surgery, and the use of new suture materials have reduced the incidence of incisional hernia. Nevertheless, incisional hernia still occurs in 0.5% to 11% of all laparotomies performed. There are many different techniques currently in use for ventral incisional hernia (VIH) repair. Among these techniques, laparoscopic repair has been reported to be superior to open repair because of less pain, a lower recurrence rate, fewer complications, and earlier return to work. The lower rate of complications may be a major contributing factor to a reduced incidence of recurrence. However, laparoscopic repair requires expensive equipment and supplies, and it is not yet generally accepted. No conclusive randomized trial of sufficient size and power has been done to establish the "gold standard" for VIH repair, and surgeons are calling for proper evaluation. This randomized clinical trial conducted at 3 Veterans Affairs medical centers was designed to compare open VIH repair with the laparoscopic technique with respect to postoperative complications at 8 weeks, health-related quality of life, postoperative pain, time to return to normal activities, patient satisfaction, and recurrence rate of the hernia at 1 and 2 years. The study design calls for randomization of 314 men over a period of 32 months. This will allow > or =80% power to detect a 15% difference in complication rates between the 2 surgical procedures at 8 weeks. Randomization is stratified by hospital, whether the hernia is recurrent and whether the patient's body mass index is > or =35 or <35. We report the design and beginning of a multicenter trial comparing open and laparoscopic VIH repair. When completed, this study will provide surgeons and their patients with information that will help guide their choice of surgical technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15610889     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  23 in total

1.  Open randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Francisco Asencio; Javier Aguiló; Salvador Peiró; Juan Carbó; Ramón Ferri; Federico Caro; Marwan Ahmad
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Intraperitoneal onlay mesh: an experimental study of adhesion formation in a sheep model.

Authors:  N B Zinther; P Wara; H Friis-Andersen
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Classification and valuation of postoperative complications in a randomized trial of open versus laparoscopic ventral herniorrhaphy.

Authors:  H M A Kaafarani; K Hur; M Campasano; D J Reda; K M F Itani
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 4.  Effect of laparoscopic abdominal surgery on splanchnic circulation: historical developments.

Authors:  Sinan Hatipoglu; Sami Akbulut; Filiz Hatipoglu; Ruslan Abdullayev
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Assessment of predictive factors for recurrence in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair using a bridging technique.

Authors:  P Hauters; J Desmet; D Gherardi; S Dewaele; H Poilvache; P Malvaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Fibrin glue for intraperitoneal laparoscopic mesh fixation: a comparative study in a swine model.

Authors:  Tatyan Clarke; Namir Katkhouda; Rodney J Mason; Bon C Cheng; Jeffrey Algra; Jaisa Olasky; Helen J Sohn; Ashkan Moazzez; Maryam Balouch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A randomised, multi-centre, prospective, double blind pilot-study to evaluate safety and efficacy of the non-absorbable Optilene Mesh Elastic versus the partly absorbable Ultrapro Mesh for incisional hernia repair.

Authors:  Christoph Seiler; Petra Baumann; Peter Kienle; Andreas Kuthe; Jens Kuhlgatz; Rainer Engemann; Moritz V Frankenberg; Hanns-Peter Knaebel
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Open onlay mesh repair for major abdominal wall hernias with selective use of components separation and fibrin sealant.

Authors:  Andrew N Kingsnorth; M Kamran Shahid; Aby J Valliattu; Robert A Hadden; Christine S Porter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Laparoscopic management of incisional hernias > or = 15 cm in diameter.

Authors:  G C Ferrari; A Miranda; F Sansonna; C Magistro; S Di Lernia; D Maggioni; M Franzetti; R Pugliese
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Is it safe to perform laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with mesh in elderly patients?

Authors:  Y K Lee; A Iqbal; M Vitamvas; C McBride; J Thompson; D Oleynikov
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.