Literature DB >> 15610446

Risk of colorectal adenomas in a multiethnic Asian patient population: race does not matter.

Shanmugarajah Rajendra1, Jacqueline J Ho, John Arokiasamy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ethnic differences have been reported for colorectal polyps and large bowel cancer; although the supporting data is weak and insufficient to draw firm conclusions. AIM: We undertook this study to determine whether such racial disparity in colorectal adenomas exists in an ethnically mixed non-migrant population. The prevalence, histology and distribution of colonic polyps were documented as well as other known risk factors for colorectal malignancy.
METHODS: In this prospective cross-sectional study, 311 consecutive referred and self-referred multiracial patients attending for colonoscopy over a 41-month period in a private endoscopy center were recruited. The mean age of the study population was 51.8 +/- 14 years (range 16-91). The male to female ratio was 1.1 and an ethnic breakdown as follows: 87 Malays, 115 Chinese and 109 Indians.
RESULTS: Sixty-three adenomas were recorded in 36 patients: six Malays, 19 Chinese and 11 Indians. Of these adenomas, 59 were polypoid, three flat and one depressed. The majority of adenomas 42/63 (67%) were distal to the splenic flexure as were all (10/10) the Duke's A carcinomas and 6/8 (75%) of the advanced cancers. Patients with adenoma(s) compared with those without (controls) were significantly older (P = 0.005), more likely to have a family history of colorectal cancer (P = 0.005), and showed a trend towards significance for ethnic group (P = 0.09) on univariate analysis. Using logistic regression analysis, only family history (P = 0.05) and age > or = 50 years (P = 0.011) were found to be significantly associated with adenomas.
CONCLUSION: Risk factors for colonic adenoma(s) in our cohort of symptomatic multiethnic patients attending for colonoscopy do not seem to differ from those reported elsewhere and, in particular, race does not appear to be a factor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15610446     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2004.03522.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  4 in total

1.  Birthplace is not a determinant of colorectal adenomas.

Authors:  Fiona Tran; Jenn Hian Koo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large rectal adenomas.

Authors:  Marco Ettore Allaix; Alberto Arezzo; Paola Cassoni; Federico Famiglietti; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Polyp detection rate and pathological features in patients undergoing a comprehensive colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad; Sara Ashtari; Mohmad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Vahid Chaleshi; Fakhrosadat Anaraki; Mehrdad Haghazali; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15

4.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study).

Authors:  Frank J C van den Broek; Eelco J R de Graaf; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Johannes B Reitsma; Jelle Haringsma; Robin Timmer; Bas L A M Weusten; Michael F Gerhards; Esther C J Consten; Matthijs P Schwartz; Maarten J Boom; Erik J Derksen; A Bart Bijnen; Paul H P Davids; Christiaan Hoff; Hendrik M van Dullemen; G Dimitri N Heine; Klaas van der Linde; Jeroen M Jansen; Rosalie C H Mallant-Hent; Ronald Breumelhof; Han Geldof; James C H Hardwick; Pascal G Doornebosch; Annekatrien C T M Depla; Miranda F Ernst; Ivo P van Munster; Ignace H J T de Hingh; Erik J Schoon; Willem A Bemelman; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.