Literature DB >> 15610108

The prevalence of urinary incontinence in community-dwelling married women: a matter of definition.

Vera Vandoninck1, Bart L H Bemelmans, Chiara Mazzetta, Chris Robertson, Martin Keech, Peter Boyle, Lambertus A Kiemeney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of female urinary incontinence (UI) and its impact on quality of life. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a Dutch national postal questionnaire survey, 1460 spouses of 1771 men in the town of Boxmeer, age-stratified and randomly selected, were asked to participate. The prevalence of UI in the women was assessed in two ways. First, a total score on a short UI-specific questionnaire differentiated them into three groups, i.e. no symptoms (score 0-2), minimally (3-6) or severely incontinent (7-14). Second, a self-reported UI prevalence was calculated by asking respondents if they ever had urine loss. To conform to the International Continence Society standard definition, spouses were also asked to complete a general (Short Form-12) and lower urinary tract disease-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, and were asked about their need to seek help.
RESULTS: The questionnaires were returned by 1071 women (mean age 57 years, range 29-79; response rate 73%); 34% were regarded as minimally and 12% as severely incontinent. The self-reported UI rate was 40%. Disease-specific and general quality of life was significantly lower for women with UI than for those with minimal or no urine loss; 38% of incontinent respondents had consulted a physician for their UI, and among respondents with minimal complaints this was 28%.
CONCLUSIONS: Up to 46% of the married female population had some degree of UI, and severe UI significantly compromised their quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15610108     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05214.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  8 in total

Review 1.  Lower urinary tract disease: what are we trying to treat and in whom?

Authors:  Jeremy P W Heaton
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence among Chinese women in Shanghai.

Authors:  Bo Liu; Lei Wang; Sheng-Song Huang; Qiang Wu; Deng-Long Wu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-03-15

3.  Prevalence and risk factors for pelvic floor symptoms in women in rural El Salvador.

Authors:  Begüm Ozel; Anne Marie Borchelt; Francesca M Cimino; Miriam Cremer
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-01-09

4.  Effects of a new community-based reproductive health intervention on knowledge of and attitudes and behaviors toward stress urinary incontinence among young women in Shanghai: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Yuan He; Jue Wang; Ying Zhang; Jingxin Ding; Ke-qin Hua
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Race and ethnic differences in health beliefs about lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  Lisa C Welch; Elizabeth M Botelho; Sharon L Tennstedt
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Follow-up of TVT operations in 1,113 women with mixed urinary incontinence at 7 and 38 months.

Authors:  Sigurd Kulseng-Hanssen; Henrik Husby; Hjalmar A Schiøtz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-09-21

7.  Impact of menopausal status on the outcome of pelvic floor physiotherapy in women with urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Christiana Campani Nygaard; Cornelia Betschart; Ahmed A Hafez; Erica Lewis; Ilias Chasiotis; Stergios K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  Conservative management of voiding dysfunction.

Authors:  Anita Patel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.