Literature DB >> 15609801

Consumer involvement in the health technology assessment program.

Jane Royle1, Sandy Oliver.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to describe a cycle of development leading to sustainable methods for involving consumers in the management of a program commissioning health technology assessment.
METHODS: Staff time was dedicated to developing procedures for recruiting and briefing consumers to participate in prioritizing, commissioning, and reporting research. Resources and support were developed in light of early feedback from consumers and those working with them. These were piloted and amended before being used routinely.
RESULTS: Over 4 years, procedures and resources have been developed to support six consumers attending seven to eight prioritization meetings a year; thirty to forty-five consumers each year commenting on research need for particular topics; thirty consumers a year commenting on research proposals, and twenty a year commenting on research reports. The procedures include clear job descriptions, induction and development days, clear briefing materials, payment for substantial tasks, and regularly seeking feedback to improve procedures.
CONCLUSIONS: Explicit, inclusive, and reproducible methods for supporting consumer involvement that satisfy National Health Service policy recommendations for involving consumers in research require dedicated staff time to support a cycle of organizational development.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15609801     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462304001412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  19 in total

1.  Public involvement in setting a national research agenda: a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Sandy Oliver; David G Armes; Gill Gyte
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 3.377

3.  The integration of citizens into a science/policy network in genetics: governance arrangements and asymmetry in expertise.

Authors:  Geneviève Daudelin; Pascale Lehoux; Julia Abelson; Jean L Denis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Involving patients in HTA activities at local level: a study protocol based on the collaboration between researchers and knowledge users.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Johanne Gagnon; Michèle St-Pierre; François-Pierre Gauvin; Florence Piron; Marc Rhainds; Martin Coulombe; Dolores Lepage-Savary; Marie Desmartis; Mylène Tantchou Dipankui; France Légaré
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Lean systems approaches to health technology assessment: a patient-focused alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment: findings from a citizens' jury.

Authors:  Devidas Menon; Tania Stafinski
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Introducing the patient's perspective in hospital health technology assessment (HTA): the views of HTA producers, hospital managers and patients.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Marie Desmartis; Johanne Gagnon; Michèle St-Pierre; François-Pierre Gauvin; Marc Rhainds; Dolorès Lepage-Savary; Martin Coulombe; Mylène Tantchou Dipankui; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.

Authors:  Jo Brett; Sophie Staniszewska; Carole Mockford; Sandra Herron-Marx; John Hughes; Colin Tysall; Rashida Suleman
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  As the bell tolls: a foundation study on pancreatic cancer consumer's research priorities.

Authors:  Carla Saunders; Helen Gooden; Monica Robotin; Jan Mumford
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-09-09

10.  Introducing patient perspective in health technology assessment at the local level.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Dolorès Lepage-Savary; Johanne Gagnon; Michèle St-Pierre; Chantale Simard; Marc Rhainds; Renald Lemieux; François-Pierre Gauvin; Marie Desmartis; France Légaré
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.