Graham O Solley1. 1. Watkins Medical Centre, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. solleybg@futureweb.com.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Stings and bites from various insects are responsible for many anaphylactic events. OBJECTIVE: To document the clinical features of specific forms of anaphylaxis and investigate clinical concerns regarding stinging and biting insect allergy. METHODS: All patients presenting for evaluation of adverse reactions to insect stings or bites between December 1980 and December 1997 had the clinical details of their reactions recorded and their reactions classified. RESULTS: The spectrum of clinical symptoms and signs is similar to that seen in anaphylaxis from other sources; stings on the head or neck are not more likely to cause life-threatening reactions than stings elsewhere on the body; a lesser reaction will not necessarily lead to a more serious reaction from a future sting; asthmatic patients do appear to have an increased risk of asthma as a feature of their anaphylactic response; anaphylaxis is usually confined to a particular insect species for the individual patient; patients who have had multiple stings at one time may have experienced true anaphylaxis and not a "toxic" response; and patients who have had anaphylaxis from other sources are at no greater risk than that of the general population of reacting similarly to insect stings or bites. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylactic events from insect stings show the same clinical features as those from other sources. Systemic reactions seem confined to a specific insect species. Patients who experience RXN3 reactions from multiple stings at one time should undergo specific venom testing, because many have experienced true anaphylaxis and not a toxic response. Future consideration should be given to the role of beta-adrenergic antagonists and ACE inhibitors in patients with systemic reactions.
BACKGROUND: Stings and bites from various insects are responsible for many anaphylactic events. OBJECTIVE: To document the clinical features of specific forms of anaphylaxis and investigate clinical concerns regarding stinging and biting insect allergy. METHODS: All patients presenting for evaluation of adverse reactions to insect stings or bites between December 1980 and December 1997 had the clinical details of their reactions recorded and their reactions classified. RESULTS: The spectrum of clinical symptoms and signs is similar to that seen in anaphylaxis from other sources; stings on the head or neck are not more likely to cause life-threatening reactions than stings elsewhere on the body; a lesser reaction will not necessarily lead to a more serious reaction from a future sting; asthmatic patients do appear to have an increased risk of asthma as a feature of their anaphylactic response; anaphylaxis is usually confined to a particular insect species for the individual patient; patients who have had multiple stings at one time may have experienced true anaphylaxis and not a "toxic" response; and patients who have had anaphylaxis from other sources are at no greater risk than that of the general population of reacting similarly to insect stings or bites. CONCLUSIONS: Anaphylactic events from insect stings show the same clinical features as those from other sources. Systemic reactions seem confined to a specific insect species. Patients who experience RXN3 reactions from multiple stings at one time should undergo specific venom testing, because many have experienced true anaphylaxis and not a toxic response. Future consideration should be given to the role of beta-adrenergic antagonists and ACE inhibitors in patients with systemic reactions.
Authors: Susan A Rudders; Aleena Banerji; Daniel P Katzman; Sunday Clark; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 6.347
Authors: Iwona Poziomkowska-Gęsicka; Magdalena Kostrzewska; Michał Kurek Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Troy Wanandy; Emily Mulcahy; Wun Yee Lau; Simon G A Brown; Michael D Wiese Journal: Clin Rev Allergy Immunol Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 8.667
Authors: Franziska Ruëff; Bernhard Przybilla; Maria Beatrice Biló; Ulrich Müller; Fabian Scheipl; Michael J Seitz; Werner Aberer; Anna Bodzenta-Lukaszyk; Floriano Bonifazi; Paolo Campi; Ulf Darsow; Gabrielle Haeberli; Thomas Hawranek; Helmut Küchenhoff; Roland Lang; Oliviero Quercia; Norbert Reider; Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier; Maurizio Severino; Gunter Johannes Sturm; Regina Treudler; Brunello Wüthrich Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-05-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Manisha Manmohan; Sabine Müller; Michèle Myriam Rauber; Frank Koberne; H Reisch; Joachim Koster; Richard Böhm; Martin Messelken; Matthias Fischer; Thilo Jakob Journal: Allergo J Int Date: 2018-01-16