Literature DB >> 15609312

High-resolution analysis of 16q22.1 in breast carcinoma using DNA amplifiable probes (multiplex amplifiable probe hybridization technique) and immunohistochemistry.

Emad A Rakha1, John A L Armour, Sarah E Pinder, Claire E Paish, Ian O Ellis.   

Abstract

Loss of the chromosomal material at 16q22.1 is one of the most frequent genetic aberrations found in both lobular and low-grade nonlobular invasive carcinoma of the breast, indicating the presence of a tumour suppressor gene (TSG) at this region in these tumours. However, the TSG (s) at the 16q22.1 in the more frequent nonlobular carcinomas is still unknown. Multiplex Amplifiable Probe Hybridisation (MAPH) is a simple, accurate and a high-resolution technique that provides an alternative approach to DNA copy-number measurement. The aim of our study was to examine the most likely candidate genes at 16q22.1 using MAPH assay combined with protein expression analysis by immunohistochemistry. We identified deletion at 16q22.1 that involves some or all of these genes. We also noticed that the smallest region of deletion at 16q22.1 could be delineated to a 3 Mb region centromeric to the P-cadherin gene. Apart from the correlation between E-cadherin protein expression and its gene copy number, no correlation was detected between the expression of E2F-4, CTCF, TRF2 or P-cadherin with their gene's copy number. In the malignant tissues, no significant loss or decrease of protein expression of any gene other than E-cadherin was seen in association with any specific tumour type. No expression of VE-cadherin or Ksp-cadherin was detected in the normal and/or malignant tissues of the breast in these cases. However, there was a correlation between increased nuclear expression of E2F-4 and tumours with higher histological grade (p = 0.04) and positive lymph node disease (p = 0.02), suggesting that it may have an oncogenic rather than a tumour suppressor role. The malignant breast tissues also showed abnormal cytoplasmic cellular localisation of CTCF, compared to its expression in the normal parenchymal cells. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that MAPH is a potential technique for assessment of genomic imbalances in malignant tissues. Although our results support E-cadherin as the TSG in invasive lobular carcinoma, they argue against the candidacy of E2F-4, CTCF, TRF2, P-cadherin, Ksp-cadherin and VE-cadherin as TSGs in breast cancer. 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15609312     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.20738

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  7 in total

1.  Infrequent mutation of ATBF1 in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Xiaodong Sun; Yingfa Zhou; Kristen B Otto; Mingrong Wang; Ceshi Chen; Wei Zhou; Krithika Subramanian; Paula M Vertino; Jin-Tang Dong
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Emerging roles of E2Fs in cancer: an exit from cell cycle control.

Authors:  Hui-Zi Chen; Shih-Yin Tsai; Gustavo Leone
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Cooperation of ATF4 and CTCF promotes adipogenesis through transcriptional regulation.

Authors:  Yingchun Chen; Rongquan He; Zhiqiang Han; Yanyan Wu; Qiuyan Wang; Xiujuan Zhu; Zhiguang Huang; Juan Ye; Yao Tang; Hongbin Huang; Jianxu Chen; Hong Shan; Fei Xiao
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 6.819

4.  Breast tumor copy number aberration phenotypes and genomic instability.

Authors:  Jane Fridlyand; Antoine M Snijders; Bauke Ylstra; Hua Li; Adam Olshen; Richard Segraves; Shanaz Dairkee; Taku Tokuyasu; Britt Marie Ljung; Ajay N Jain; Jane McLennan; John Ziegler; Koei Chin; Sandy Devries; Heidi Feiler; Joe W Gray; Frederic Waldman; Daniel Pinkel; Donna G Albertson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  CTCF genetic alterations in endometrial carcinoma are pro-tumorigenic.

Authors:  A D Marshall; C G Bailey; K Champ; M Vellozzi; P O'Young; C Metierre; Y Feng; A Thoeng; A M Richards; U Schmitz; M Biro; R Jayasinghe; L Ding; L Anderson; E R Mardis; J E J Rasko
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 6.  Novel functions for the transcription factor E2F4 in development and disease.

Authors:  Jenny Hsu; Julien Sage
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.534

7.  Pan-cancer driver copy number alterations identified by joint expression/CNA data analysis.

Authors:  Gaojianyong Wang; Dimitris Anastassiou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.