Literature DB >> 15609143

Modelling the costs and effects of leflunomide in rheumatoid arthritis.

G Kobelt1, P Lindgren, A Young.   

Abstract

This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of leflunomide (LEF) compared to methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the United Kingdom. A Markov model was constructed using health states defined by Health Assessment Questionnaire score. The model is based on a cohort of patients with recently diagnosed definite RA who were followed for up to 15 years at nine rheumatology clinics in the UK. The treatment effect was calculated based on clinical trials comparing LEF to MTX (one international and one United States trial) and to SSZ (one international trial). Transitions between health states for the first 2 years of treatment were calculated from the clinical trials, while the extrapolation beyond the trial was based on the Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Study cohort, using an ordered probit model. This makes it possible to predict transitions for patients with similar characteristics (age, time since disease onset) as in the trials. Separate analyses were performed for each trial, and all analyses covered a 10-year timeframe. Using the US trial, LEF had slightly lower costs and better effects (44,017 and 4.307 pounds QALYs, compared to 44,988 and 4.158 pounds QALYs for MTX), while for the international trial this was reversed (34,070 and 4.487 pounds QALYs for MTX compared to 36,351 and 4.372 pounds QALYs for LEF). Compared to SSZ, the cost of using LEF was slightly lower, with an increase in QALYs (35,855 and 3.896 pounds QALYs compared to 36,731 and 3.721 pounds QALYs for SSZ). The two trials comparing LEF to MTX gave differing results. One possible reason for this is that MTX patients in the US trial were given folic acid, whereas in the international trial folate supplementation was not mandated. This may have reduced the effectiveness of MTX. In the UK it is standard practice to use folic acid with MTX, and therefore the results from the US trial may be more relevant for the UK. Compared to SSZ, the use of LEF appears to be cost-effective in the UK.

Entities:  

Year:  2002        PMID: 15609143     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-002-0126-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  7 in total

Review 1.  International variation in resource utilisation and treatment costs for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hubertus Rosery; Rito Bergemann; Stefanie Maxion-Bergemann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Modelling cost effectiveness and cost utility of sequential DMARD therapy including leflunomide for rheumatoid arthritis in Germany: II. The contribution of leflunomide to efficiency.

Authors:  Peter K Schädlich; Henning Zeidler; Angela Zink; Erika Gromnica-Ihle; Matthias Schneider; Christoph Straub; Josef G Brecht; Eduard Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  How to select the right cost-effectiveness model? : A systematic review and stepwise approach for selecting a transferable health economic evaluation model for rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H G M van Haalen; J L Severens; A Tran-Duy; A Boonen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis: a critical review of measures used to define health States.

Authors:  Nick Bansback; Roberta Ara; Jonathan Karnon; Aslam Anis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Health economic modelling of treatment sequences for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan Tosh; Matt Stevenson; Ron Akehurst
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Cost effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis. A systematic review literature.

Authors:  Maurizio Benucci; Gianantonio Saviola; Mariangela Manfredi; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini; Fabiola Atzeni
Journal:  Int J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-11-22

7.  Clinical and demographic factors associated with change and maintenance of disease severity in a large registry of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  George W Reed; David H Collier; Andrew S Koenig; Katherine C Saunders; Dimitrios A Pappas; Heather J Litman; Joel M Kremer; Sameer Kotak
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 5.156

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.