Literature DB >> 15608833

Morbidity and significant bacteriuria after urodynamic studies.

P Quek1, L H Tay.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Urodynamic pressure flow studies (PFS) are increasingly utilised in assessing patients with lower urinary tract (LUT) dysfunction. Although minimally invasive, there is theoretical risk of morbidity and infection. This paper looks at the morbidity, the incidence and natural history of significant bacteriuria (SBU) occurring after PFS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing PFS in a General Hospital and meeting entry criteria were enrolled with informed consent. Each had urine culture specimens collected at the time of PFS (D0), 3 (D3) and 7 (D7) days after PFS and a 7-day symptom log.
RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (44 males and 49 females), with a mean age of 52.2 years (range, 17 to 89) were evaluated. Twenty-five per cent (23/93) developed irritative LUT symptoms after PFS, but only 2/23 had a positive urine culture. All symptoms in culture-negative patients resolved within 5 days and none had sought medical treatment. The overall incidence of SBU was 13.9% (13/93) of whom 11/13 (95.7%) were asymptomatic. Majority of SBUs were detected on D3 but 30% developed late (D7). All asymptomatic SBUs were treated expectantly and 70% (7/11) resolved spontaneously by D14. 81.8% of organisms cultured were coliforms, and 18.2% enterococcus. There was no statistically significant correlation between age, sex, post-void residual and bladder outlet obstruction (diagnosed by PFS) and post-PFS morbidity or SBU.
CONCLUSION: Symptoms occurring after PFS are mild, transient and rarely associated with infection. SBU after PFS is largely asymptomatic and self-resolving. Given the extremely low rate of symptomatic infection, antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15608833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Acad Med Singapore        ISSN: 0304-4602            Impact factor:   2.473


  6 in total

Review 1.  Is multichannel urodynamic assessment necessary before considering a surgical treatment of BPH? Pros and cons.

Authors:  Xavier Biardeau; Mohamed A Elkoushy; Shachar Aharony; Mostafa Elhilali; Jacques Corcos
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Urodynamics tests for the diagnosis and management of bladder outlet obstruction in men: the UPSTREAM non-inferiority RCT.

Authors:  Amanda L Lewis; Grace J Young; Lucy E Selman; Caoimhe Rice; Clare Clement; Cynthia A Ochieng; Paul Abrams; Peter S Blair; Christopher Chapple; Cathryn Ma Glazener; Jeremy Horwood; John S McGrath; Sian Noble; Gordon T Taylor; J Athene Lane; Marcus J Drake
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Prophylactic Antibiotics for Urinary Tract Infections after Urodynamic Studies: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Yu Wu; Yu Cheng; Sheng-Fei Xu; Qing Ling; Xiao-Yi Yuan; Guang-Hui Du
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-02-28       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Urinary tract infection in the neurogenic bladder.

Authors:  Humberto R Vigil; Duane R Hickling
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-02

5.  Recommendations for conducting invasive urodynamics for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: Qualitative interview findings from a large randomized controlled trial (UPSTREAM).

Authors:  Lucy E Selman; Cynthia A Ochieng; Amanda L Lewis; Marcus J Drake; Jeremy Horwood
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 2.696

6.  Rate of urinary tract infection after urodynamic study in pelvic floor clinic.

Authors:  Zinat Ghanbari; Fedyeh Haghollahi; Tahere Eftekhr; Tahere Froghifar; Mamak Shariat; Maryam Hajihashemy; Mohsen Ayati
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2020
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.