OBJECTIVES: To investigate by questionnaire, the use and selection of materials and techniques for the placement of direct restorations and the provision of endodontics and bleaching by dental practitioners in the North West of England and Scotland. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 1,000 general dental practitioners selected at random from dentists in Scotland and the North West of England. Non-responders were sent another questionnaire after a period of 4 weeks had elapsed. RESULTS: A total of 701 usable questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 70%. The most commonly used material for the restoration of Class II cavities in premolar and permanent molar teeth was amalgam (n = 605, 86%) and (n = 634, 90%) respectively. Many practitioners (n = 419, 60%) felt amalgam should continue to be used but a majority (n = 374, 66%) remained unconvinced about the merits of amalgam bonding. A minority (n = 63, 9%) of practitioners used predominantly directly placed resin composite rather than amalgam to restore Class II cavities in premolar and permanent molar teeth. Home-based vital bleaching was provided by a significant number (n = 245, 35%) of practitioners with only 18% (n = 123) providing practice-based bleaching. The most commonly used endodontic obturation technique was cold lateral condensation (n = 527, 75%) with 61% (n = 425) of respondents not using rubber dam routinely for endodontics. CONCLUSIONS: For the practitioners in this survey, amalgam was the most frequently selected direct restorative material. Few practitioners used amalgam bonding let alone direct resin composite for posterior restorations. Home-based rather than practice-based bleaching procedures were preferred, as were more traditional endodontic obturation techniques.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate by questionnaire, the use and selection of materials and techniques for the placement of direct restorations and the provision of endodontics and bleaching by dental practitioners in the North West of England and Scotland. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 1,000 general dental practitioners selected at random from dentists in Scotland and the North West of England. Non-responders were sent another questionnaire after a period of 4 weeks had elapsed. RESULTS: A total of 701 usable questionnaires were returned, giving a response rate of 70%. The most commonly used material for the restoration of Class II cavities in premolar and permanent molar teeth was amalgam (n = 605, 86%) and (n = 634, 90%) respectively. Many practitioners (n = 419, 60%) felt amalgam should continue to be used but a majority (n = 374, 66%) remained unconvinced about the merits of amalgam bonding. A minority (n = 63, 9%) of practitioners used predominantly directly placed resin composite rather than amalgam to restore Class II cavities in premolar and permanent molar teeth. Home-based vital bleaching was provided by a significant number (n = 245, 35%) of practitioners with only 18% (n = 123) providing practice-based bleaching. The most commonly used endodontic obturation technique was cold lateral condensation (n = 527, 75%) with 61% (n = 425) of respondents not using rubber dam routinely for endodontics. CONCLUSIONS: For the practitioners in this survey, amalgam was the most frequently selected direct restorative material. Few practitioners used amalgam bonding let alone direct resin composite for posterior restorations. Home-based rather than practice-based bleaching procedures were preferred, as were more traditional endodontic obturation techniques.
Authors: Gregg H Gilbert; Mark S Litaker; Daniel J Pihlstrom; Craig W Amundson; Valeria V Gordan Journal: Oper Dent Date: 2010 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.440
Authors: Nathaniel C Lawson; Gregg H Gilbert; Ellen Funkhouser; Paul D Eleazer; Paul L Benjamin; Donald C Worley Journal: J Endod Date: 2015-05-23 Impact factor: 4.171
Authors: Mona F Anabtawi; Gregg H Gilbert; Michael R Bauer; Gregg Reams; Sonia K Makhija; Paul L Benjamin; O Dale Williams Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 3.634