Literature DB >> 1560799

The clinical course of pulmonary embolism.

J L Carson1, M A Kelley, A Duff, J G Weg, W J Fulkerson, H I Palevsky, J S Schwartz, B T Thompson, J Popovich, T E Hobbins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is a potentially fatal disorder. Information about the outcome of clinically recognized pulmonary embolism is sparse, particularly given that new treatments for more seriously ill patients are now available.
METHODS: We prospectively followed 399 patients with pulmonary embolism diagnosed by lung scanning and pulmonary angiography, who were enrolled in a multicenter diagnostic trial. We reviewed all hospitalizations, all new investigations of pulmonary embolism, and all deaths among the patients within one year of diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of the 399 patients, 375 (94 percent) received treatment for pulmonary embolism, usually conventional anticoagulation. Only 10 patients (2.5 percent) died of pulmonary embolism; 9 of them had clinically suspected recurrent pulmonary embolism. Clinically apparent pulmonary embolism recurred in 33 patients (8.3 percent), of whom 45 percent died during follow-up. Ninety-five patients with pulmonary embolism (23.8 percent) died within one year. The conditions associated with these deaths were cancer (relative risk, 3.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.3 to 6.4), left-sided congestive heart failure (relative risk, 2.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 4.6), and chronic lung disease (relative risk, 2.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.0). The most frequent causes of death in patients with pulmonary embolism were cancer (in 34.7 percent), infection (22.1 percent), and cardiac disease (16.8 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: When properly diagnosed and treated, clinically apparent pulmonary embolism was an uncommon cause of death, and it recurred in only a small minority of patients. Most deaths were due to underlying diseases. Patients with pulmonary embolism who had cancer, congestive heart failure, or chronic lung disease had a higher risk of dying within one year than did other patients with pulmonary embolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1560799     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199205073261902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  139 in total

1.  Should we look further for cancer in a patient with venous thromboembolism?

Authors:  D E Arterburn; W S Richardson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-05

2.  Anticoagulants for deep venous thrombosis.

Authors:  D K Cundiff
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Anticoagulation in patients with thromboembolic disease.

Authors:  R C Tait
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 4.  General medical care on the neuromedical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Robin S Howard; Jeremy Radcliffe; Nicholas P Hirsch
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Chinese multi-center study of lung scintigraphy and CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Jia He; Feng Wang; Hao-jie Dai; Mei Li; Qian Wang; Zhiming Yao; Bin Lv; Chang-ming Xiong; Jian-guo He; Zhi-hong Liu; Zuo-Xiang He; Wei Fang
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  CTPA as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Rosa M Estrada-Y-Martin; Sandra A Oldham
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Prospective respiratory-triggered 64-slice CT pulmonary angiography for detection of pulmonary embolism--a feasibility study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Frank Oliver G Henes; Michael Groth; Marc Regier; Thorsten Bley; Hans-Dieter Nagel; Gerhard Adam; Philipp G C Begemann
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2010-07-04

Review 8.  Acute pulmonary embolism. Part 1: epidemiology and diagnosis.

Authors:  Renée A Douma; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Harry R Büller
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for ambulatory cancer patients, can we do better?

Authors:  Hikmat Abdel-Razeq; Asem Mansour
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 10.  Risk of venous thromboembolism among patients with vasculitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patompong Ungprasert; Matthew J Koster; Charat Thongprayoon; Kenneth J Warrington
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.