Literature DB >> 15607887

Mechanical differences between lumbar and tail discs in the mouse.

Joseph J Sarver1, Dawn M Elliott.   

Abstract

The mouse lumbar and tail discs are both used as models to study disc degeneration; however, the mechanical behavior of these two levels has not been compared. The objective of this study was to compare the elastic and viscoelastic mechanical properties of lumbar and tail discs of the mouse under axial compression-tension loading. We hypothesized that tail discs would have a larger transition zone (e.g., neutral zone) and would be less stiff in compression. To test these hypotheses, lumbar and tail bone-disc-bone motion segments were loaded in axial compression and tension. The nonlinear elastic mechanical behavior was examined using a tri-linear curvefit. Elastic behavior of lumbar and tail discs was most different in the low-stiffness transition region (neutral zone), where lumbar discs were nearly twice as stiff over half the axial displacement. In addition, viscoelastic behavior, which was examined using a stretch-exponential curvefit, also showed large lumbar and tail differences, where lumbar discs compressed by 60% of their original height and tail discs by 98% after static creep compression. These results demonstrate that tail discs undergo far more axial displacement than lumbar discs under the same load. These findings are relevant to rodent tail models where chronic loads are applied in vivo to study mechanical pathways of degeneration. Furthermore, the tri-linear model, used here to curvefit the nonlinear compression-tension data, quantified stiffness in the transition zone for the first time, which may prove useful in future disc mechanical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15607887     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.04.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  28 in total

1.  Role of endplates in contributing to compression behaviors of motion segments and intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Jeffrey J MacLean; Julia P Owen; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  In vitro organ culture of the bovine intervertebral disc: effects of vertebral endplate and potential for mechanobiology studies.

Authors:  Cynthia R Lee; James C Iatridis; Lucy Poveda; Mauro Alini
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Effects of enzymatic digestion on compressive properties of rat intervertebral discs.

Authors:  Ana Barbir; Arthur J Michalek; Rosalyn D Abbott; James C Iatridis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  The aging mouse partially models the aging human spine: lumbar and coccygeal disc height, composition, mechanical properties, and Wnt signaling in young and old mice.

Authors:  Nilsson Holguin; Rhiannon Aguilar; Robin A Harland; Bradley A Bomar; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-05-01

5.  Differential Effect of Long-Term Systemic Exposure of TNFα on Health of the Annulus Fibrosus and Nucleus Pulposus of the Intervertebral Disc.

Authors:  Deborah J Gorth; Olivia K Ottone; Irving M Shapiro; Makarand V Risbud
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Heme oxygenase-1 modulates degeneration of the intervertebral disc after puncture in Bach 1 deficient mice.

Authors:  Ryo Ohta; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kazuyoshi Nakanishi; Naosuke Kamei; Toshio Nakamae; Bunichiro Izumi; Yuki Fujioka; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Rat disc torsional mechanics: effect of lumbar and caudal levels and axial compression load.

Authors:  Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Neil R Malhotra; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Effects of cement augmentation on the mechanical stability of multilevel spine after vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Eelin Tan; Tian Wang; Matthew H Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-06

9.  Low-intensity vibrations partially maintain intervertebral disc mechanics and spinal muscle area during deconditioning.

Authors:  Nilsson Holguin; John T Martin; Dawn M Elliott; Stefan Judex
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  An in vivo model of reduced nucleus pulposus glycosaminoglycan content in the rat lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  John I Boxberger; Joshua D Auerbach; Sounok Sen; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.