Literature DB >> 15606773

Transcriptional responses to glucose at different glycolytic rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Karin Elbing1, Anders Ståhlberg, Stefan Hohmann, Lena Gustafsson.   

Abstract

The addition of glucose to Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells causes reprogramming of gene expression. Glucose is sensed by membrane receptors as well as (so far elusive) intracellular sensing mechanisms. The availability of four yeast strains that display different hexose uptake capacities allowed us to study glucose-induced effects at different glycolytic rates. Rapid glucose responses were observed in all strains able to take up glucose, consistent with intracellular sensing. The degree of long-term responses, however, clearly correlated with the glycolytic rate: glucose-stimulated expression of genes encoding enzymes of the lower part of glycolysis showed an almost linear correlation with the glycolytic rate, while expression levels of genes encoding gluconeogenic enzymes and invertase (SUC2) showed an inverse correlation. Glucose control of SUC2 expression is mediated by the Snf1-Mig1 pathway. Mig1 dephosphorylation upon glucose addition is known to lead to repression of target genes. Mig1 was initially dephosphorylated upon glucose addition in all strains able to take up glucose, but remained dephosphorylated only at high glycolytic rates. Remarkably, transient Mig1-dephosphorylation was accompanied by the repression of SUC2 expression at high glycolytic rates, but stimulated SUC2 expression at low glycolytic rates. This suggests that Mig1-mediated repression can be overruled by factors mediating induction via a low glucose signal. At low and moderate glycolytic rates, Mig1 was partly dephosphorylated both in the presence of phosphorylated, active Snf1, and unphosphorylated, inactive Snf1, indicating that Mig1 was actively phosphorylated and dephosphorylated simultaneously, suggesting independent control of both processes. Taken together, it appears that glucose addition affects the expression of SUC2 as well as Mig1 activity by both Snf1-dependent and -independent mechanisms that can now be dissected and resolved as early and late/sustained responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15606773     DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04451.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Biochem        ISSN: 0014-2956


  18 in total

1.  Snf1 kinase complexes with different beta subunits display stress-dependent preferences for the three Snf1-activating kinases.

Authors:  Rhonda R McCartney; Eric M Rubenstein; Martin C Schmidt
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 3.886

2.  Effect of nutrient starvation on the cellular composition and metabolic capacity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Eva Albers; Christer Larsson; Thomas Andlid; Michael C Walsh; Lena Gustafsson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Engineering of a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain with a respiratory phenotype at high external glucose concentrations.

Authors:  C Henricsson; M C de Jesus Ferreira; K Hedfalk; K Elbing; C Larsson; R M Bill; J Norbeck; S Hohmann; L Gustafsson
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Transcriptional response of steady-state yeast cultures to transient perturbations in carbon source.

Authors:  Michal Ronen; David Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Regulations of sugar transporters: insights from yeast.

Authors:  J Horák
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.886

6.  Increasing cell biomass in Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases recombinant protein yield: the use of a respiratory strain as a microbial cell factory.

Authors:  Cecilia Ferndahl; Nicklas Bonander; Christel Logez; Renaud Wagner; Lena Gustafsson; Christer Larsson; Kristina Hedfalk; Richard A J Darby; Roslyn M Bill
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.328

7.  A mixture of "cheats" and "co-operators" can enable maximal group benefit.

Authors:  R Craig MaClean; Ayari Fuentes-Hernandez; Duncan Greig; Laurence D Hurst; Ivana Gudelj
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Comparative proteomic analysis of transition of saccharomyces cerevisiae from glucose-deficient medium to glucose-rich medium.

Authors:  Bennett J Giardina; Bruce A Stanley; Hui-Ling Chiang
Journal:  Proteome Sci       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 2.480

Review 9.  Glucose signaling-mediated coordination of cell growth and cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Stefano Busti; Paola Coccetti; Lilia Alberghina; Marco Vanoni
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 3.576

10.  Oxygen dependence of metabolic fluxes and energy generation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-1A.

Authors:  Paula Jouhten; Eija Rintala; Anne Huuskonen; Anu Tamminen; Mervi Toivari; Marilyn Wiebe; Laura Ruohonen; Merja Penttilä; Hannu Maaheimo
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2008-07-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.