Literature DB >> 15606520

Photostability of sunscreen products influences the efficiency of protection with regard to UV-induced genotoxic or photoageing-related endpoints.

L Marrot1, J P Belaïdi, F Lejeune, J R Meunier, D Asselineau, F Bernerd.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute as well as chronic sun exposure induces biologically damaging effects in skin including photoageing and cancer. Ultraviolet (UV)A radiation is involved in this process; it is therefore important that sunscreen products provide efficient and stable protection in this range of wavelengths.
OBJECTIVES: This study based on in vitro approaches was performed to demonstrate that photostability is an essential requirement to protect against UVA-induced genetic and dermal alterations.
METHODS: The protection afforded by two sunscreen products, differing with regard to their photostability, was studied using biological markers related to the genotoxic or photoageing impact of UVA or simulated solar UV radiation (UV-SSR). Comet assay was used to assess direct DNA breakage, photo-oxidized purines and lomefloxacin-induced DNA breaks in nuclei of normal human keratinocytes in culture. In similar conditions, detection of p53 accumulation was performed. The use of reconstructed skin in vitro allowed us to use a three-dimensional model to analyse the dermal and epidermal damage induced by UVA or UV-SSR exposure. Abnormal morphological features of the tissue as well as fibroblast alterations and matrix metalloproteinase-1 release induced by UV exposure have been studied after topical application of products on the skin surface.
RESULTS: The results showed that the photostable product afforded better protection with regard to all the criteria studied, compared with the photounstable product.
CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that the loss of absorbing efficiency within the UVA wavelength domain due to photoinstability may have detrimental consequences on cell function and lead to impairments that have been implicated in genotoxic events as well as in the photoageing process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15606520     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06173.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN: 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


  6 in total

1.  Natural Substances for Prevention of Skin Photoaging: Screening Systems in the Development of Sunscreen and Rejuvenation Cosmetics.

Authors:  Vladimir Kostyuk; Alla Potapovich; Ahmed R Albuhaydar; Wolfgang Mayer; Chiara De Luca; Liudmila Korkina
Journal:  Rejuvenation Res       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.663

2.  Photostability of commercial sunscreens upon sun exposure and irradiation by ultraviolet lamps.

Authors:  Helena Gonzalez; Nils Tarras-Wahlberg; Birgitta Strömdahl; Asta Juzeniene; Johan Moan; Olle Larkö; Arne Rosén; Ann-Marie Wennberg
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2007-02-26

3.  Prevention of UVA-induced oxidative damage in human dermal fibroblasts by new UV filters, assessed using a novel in vitro experimental system.

Authors:  Francesca Brugè; Luca Tiano; Paola Astolfi; Monica Emanuelli; Elisabetta Damiani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Simple, green, ultrasound-assisted preparation of novel core-shell microcapsules from octyl methoxycinnamate and oligomeric proanthocyanidins for UV-stable sunscreen.

Authors:  Jie Song; Siqi Chen; Xu Zhao; Junbo Cheng; Yanli Ma; Shixue Ren; Shujun Li
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.361

5.  Light-induced cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of a sunscreen agent, 2-phenylbenzimidazole in Salmonella typhimurium TA 102 and HaCaT keratinocytes.

Authors:  Charity N Mosley; Lei Wang; Stephanie Gilley; Shuguang Wang; Hongtao Yu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Validation of the 3D reconstructed human skin Comet assay, an animal-free alternative for following-up positive results from standard in vitro genotoxicity assays.

Authors:  Stefan Pfuhler; Ralph Pirow; Thomas R Downs; Andrea Haase; Nicola Hewitt; Andreas Luch; Marion Merkel; Claudia Petrick; André Said; Monika Schäfer-Korting; Kerstin Reisinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.