Literature DB >> 15605859

A maximum-likelihood estimator for trial-to-trial variations in noisy MEG/EEG data sets.

Jan Casper de Munck1, Fetsje Bijma, Pawel Gaura, Cezary Andrzej Sieluzycki, Maria Inês Branco, R M Heethaar.   

Abstract

The standard procedure to determine the brain response from a multitrial evoked magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) data set is to average the individual trials of these data, time locked to the stimulus onset. When the brain responses vary from trial-to-trial this approach is false. In this paper, a maximum-likelihood estimator is derived for the case that the recorded data contain amplitude variations. The estimator accounts for spatially and temporally correlated background noise that is superimposed on the brain response. The model is applied to a series of 17 MEG data sets of normal subjects, obtained during median nerve stimulation. It appears that the amplitude of late component (30-120 ms) shows a systematic negative trend indicating a weakening response during stimulation time. For the early components (20-35 ms) no such a systematic effect was found. The model is furthermore applied on a MEG data set consisting of epileptic spikes of constant spatial distribution but varying polarity. For these data, the advantage of applying the model is that positive and negative spikes can be processed with a single model, thereby reducing the number of degrees of freedom and increasing the signal-to-noise ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15605859     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2004.836515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  8 in total

1.  A graphical model for estimating stimulus-evoked brain responses from magnetoencephalography data with large background brain activity.

Authors:  Srikantan S Nagarajan; Hagai T Attias; Kenneth E Hild; Kensuke Sekihara
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Estimating Granger causality after stimulus onset: a cautionary note.

Authors:  Xue Wang; Yonghong Chen; Mingzhou Ding
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Dynamic Electrical Source Imaging (DESI) of Seizures and Interictal Epileptic Discharges Without Ensemble Averaging.

Authors:  Burak Erem; Damon E Hyde; Jurriaan M Peters; Frank H Duffy; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Multiple mechanisms link prestimulus neural oscillations to sensory responses.

Authors:  Luca Iemi; Niko A Busch; Annamaria Laudini; Saskia Haegens; Jason Samaha; Arno Villringer; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  A spatiotemporal framework for estimating trial-to-trial amplitude variation in event-related MEG/EEG.

Authors:  Tulaya Limpiti; Barry D Van Veen; Hagai T Attias; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  A spatiotemporal framework for MEG/EEG evoked response amplitude and latency variability estimation.

Authors:  Tulaya Limpiti; Barry D Van Veen; Ronald T Wakai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  A fast and reliable method for simultaneous waveform, amplitude and latency estimation of single-trial EEG/MEG data.

Authors:  Wouter D Weeda; Raoul P P P Grasman; Lourens J Waldorp; Maria C van de Laar; Maurits W van der Molen; Hilde M Huizenga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of channel-dependent trial-to-trial variability of auditory evoked brain responses in MEG.

Authors:  Cezary Sielużycki; Paweł Kordowski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.819

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.