AIMS: To establish normative current perception threshold (CPT) values with neuroselective sine-wave current in the lower urinary tract and to compare these values with square-wave current CPTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 female and 8 male healthy volunteers were used for this study. A filling cystometry was performed and CPTs were determined with square-wave current at a frequency of 2.5 Hz and with neuroselective sine-wave current at 5 (C-fiber), 250 (Adelta-fiber), and 2000 Hz (Abeta-fiber) in the bladder, the posterior, and the distal urethra. RESULTS: Bladder CPTs were significantly higher compared with CPTs in the posterior urethra (P < 0.028) and in the distal urethra (P < 0.002) with all three sine-wave frequencies. No significant difference was found with any sine-wave frequency between the posterior and distal urethra (P > 0.30). Using square-wave pulses at 2.5 Hz, CPTs decreased towards the distal urethra, with a significant difference between the three stimulation sites (P < 0.0001). At all sites tested, the CPT's determined with sine-wave current at 2000 Hz were significantly higher than those at 250 Hz (P < 0.002) and 5 Hz (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between 5 Hz and 250 Hz at any site in the LUT (P > 0.50). At all sites, CPTs determined with square-wave pulses at 2.5 Hz were significantly higher than those determined with sine-wave current at all frequencies (P < 0.001). CPTs determined with all sine-wave currents were not correlated with CPTs using square-wave pulses. There was no correlation between the volumes at which sensation of filling occurred and the CPTs. CONCLUSIONS: We described normative values in young healthy volunteers at three sites in the LUT using sine-wave current. Although this type of current is said to be neuroselctive, this needs to be confirmed. Stimulation with sine-wave current is different and might be more physiologic compared to square-wave stimulation. Our data show that sine-wave current stimulation at 5 Hz, 250 Hz, and 2000 Hz can probably not be used as a semi-objective measurement of the sensation of bladder filling because no correlation was found between CPTs and the cystometeric sensation of filling.
AIMS: To establish normative current perception threshold (CPT) values with neuroselective sine-wave current in the lower urinary tract and to compare these values with square-wave current CPTs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 female and 8 male healthy volunteers were used for this study. A filling cystometry was performed and CPTs were determined with square-wave current at a frequency of 2.5 Hz and with neuroselective sine-wave current at 5 (C-fiber), 250 (Adelta-fiber), and 2000 Hz (Abeta-fiber) in the bladder, the posterior, and the distal urethra. RESULTS: Bladder CPTs were significantly higher compared with CPTs in the posterior urethra (P < 0.028) and in the distal urethra (P < 0.002) with all three sine-wave frequencies. No significant difference was found with any sine-wave frequency between the posterior and distal urethra (P > 0.30). Using square-wave pulses at 2.5 Hz, CPTs decreased towards the distal urethra, with a significant difference between the three stimulation sites (P < 0.0001). At all sites tested, the CPT's determined with sine-wave current at 2000 Hz were significantly higher than those at 250 Hz (P < 0.002) and 5 Hz (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found between 5 Hz and 250 Hz at any site in the LUT (P > 0.50). At all sites, CPTs determined with square-wave pulses at 2.5 Hz were significantly higher than those determined with sine-wave current at all frequencies (P < 0.001). CPTs determined with all sine-wave currents were not correlated with CPTs using square-wave pulses. There was no correlation between the volumes at which sensation of filling occurred and the CPTs. CONCLUSIONS: We described normative values in young healthy volunteers at three sites in the LUT using sine-wave current. Although this type of current is said to be neuroselctive, this needs to be confirmed. Stimulation with sine-wave current is different and might be more physiologic compared to square-wave stimulation. Our data show that sine-wave current stimulation at 5 Hz, 250 Hz, and 2000 Hz can probably not be used as a semi-objective measurement of the sensation of bladder filling because no correlation was found between CPTs and the cystometeric sensation of filling.
Authors: W Jerod Greer; Jonathan L Gleason; Kimberly Kenton; Jeff M Szychowski; Patricia S Goode; Holly E Richter Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.091
Authors: Anna S Nagle; John E Speich; Stefan G De Wachter; Peter P Ghamarian; David M Le; Andrew F Colhoun; Paul H Ratz; Robert W Barbee; Adam P Klausner Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Fiona Stewart; Luis F Gameiro; Regina El Dib; Monica O Gameiro; Anil Kapoor; Joao L Amaro Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-12-09
Authors: Stéphanie van der Lely; Martina Stefanovic; Melanie R Schmidhalter; Marta Pittavino; Reinhard Furrer; Martina D Liechti; Martin Schubert; Thomas M Kessler; Ulrich Mehnert Journal: BMC Urol Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 2.264
Authors: Maria Beatrice Passavanti; Vincenzo Pota; Pasquale Sansone; Caterina Aurilio; Lorenzo De Nardis; Maria Caterina Pace Journal: Pain Res Treat Date: 2017-11-20
Authors: Stéphanie van der Lely; Martina D Liechti; Werner L Popp; Melanie R Schmidhalter; Thomas M Kessler; Ulrich Mehnert Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-05-24 Impact factor: 3.240