Literature DB >> 15604921

Artifactual responses when recording auditory steady-state responses.

Susan A Small1, David R Stapells.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate, in hearing-impaired participants who could not hear the stimuli, the possibility of artifactual auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) when stimuli are presented at high intensities.
DESIGN: ASSRs to single (60 dB HL) and multiple (20 to 50 dB HL; 500 to 4000 Hz) bone-conduction stimuli as well as single 114 to 120 dB HL air-conduction stimuli, were obtained using the Rotman MASTER system, using analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion rates of 500, 1000, and 1250 Hz. Responses (p < 0.05) were considered artifactual when their numbers exceeded that expected by chance. In some conditions, we also obtained ASSRs to "alternated" stimuli (stimuli inverted and ASSRs to the two polarities averaged). A total of 17 subjects were tested.
RESULTS: Bone conduction results: 500 Hz A/D rate: Large-amplitude (43 to 1558 nV) artifactual ASSRs were seen at 40 and 50 dB HL for the 500 Hz carrier frequency. Smaller responses (28 to 53 nV) were also recorded at 20 dB HL for the 500 Hz carrier frequency. Artifactual ASSRs (17 to 62 nV) were seen at 40 dB HL and above for the 1000 Hz carrier frequency and at 50 dB HL for the 2000 Hz carrier frequency. Alternating the stimulus polarity decreased the amplitude and occurrence of these artifactual responses but did not eliminate responses for the 500 Hz carrier frequency at 40 dB HL and above. No artifactual responses were recorded for 4000 Hz stimuli for any condition. 1000 Hz A/D rate: Artifactual ASSRs (15 to 523 nV) were seen at 50 dB HL and above for the 500 Hz carrier frequency and 40 dB HL and above for the 1000 Hz carrier frequency. Artifactual responses were also obtained at 50 dB HL for a 2000 Hz carrier frequency but not at lower levels. Artifactual responses were not seen for the 4000 Hz carrier frequency. Alternating the stimulus polarity removed the responses for the 1000 and 2000 Hz carrier frequencies but did not change the results for the 500 Hz carrier frequency. 1250 Hz A/D rate: Artifactual ASSRs (16 to 220 nV) were seen at 50 dB HL and above for the 500 Hz carrier frequency and 60 dB HL and above for the 1000 Hz carrier frequency. Alternating the stimulus polarity removed the responses for the 1000 Hz carrier frequency but did not change the results for the 500 Hz carrier frequency. There were no artifactual responses at 2000 and 4000 Hz. Air conduction results: 500 Hz A/D rate: Artifactual ASSRs (49 to 153 nV) were seen for 114 to 120 dB HL stimuli for 500 and 1000 Hz carrier frequencies. Alternating the stimulus polarity removed these responses. There were no artifactual responses at 2000 and 4000 Hz. 1000 and 1250 Hz A/D rates: Artifactual ASSRs (19 to 55 nV) were seen for a 120 dB HL stimulus for a 1000 Hz carrier. Alternating the stimulus polarity removed these responses.
CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity air- or bone-conduction stimuli can produce spurious ASSRs, especially for 500 and 1000 Hz carrier frequencies. High-amplitude stimulus artifact can result in energy that is aliased to exactly the modulation frequency. Choice of signal conditioning (electroencephalogram filter slope and low-pass cutoff) and processing (A/D rate) can avoid spurious responses due to aliasing. However, artifactual responses due to other causes may still occur for bone-conduction stimuli 50 dB HL and higher (and possibly for high-level air conduction). Because the phases of these spurious responses do not invert with inversion of stimulus, the possibility of nonauditory physiologic responses cannot be ruled out. The clinical implications of these results are that artifactual responses may occur for any patient for bone-conduction stimuli at levels greater than 40 dB HL and for high-intensity air-conduction stimuli used to assess patients with profound hearing loss.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604921     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200412000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  7 in total

1.  Auditory steady-state response and auditory brainstem response thresholds in children.

Authors:  DeWet Swanepoel; Shamim Ebrahim
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Differential Group Delay of the Frequency Following Response Measured Vertically and Horizontally.

Authors:  Andrew King; Kathryn Hopkins; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-26

3.  Auditory steady state responses and cochlear implants: Modeling the artifact-response mixture in the perspective of denoising.

Authors:  Faten Mina; Virginie Attina; Yvan Duroc; Evelyne Veuillet; Eric Truy; Hung Thai-Van
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Multiple-ASSR Interactions in Adults with Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Ieda M Ishida; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

5.  Are Auditory Steady-State Responses Useful to Evaluate Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss in Children?

Authors:  Signe Schuster Grasel; Edigar Rezende de Almeida; Roberto Miquelino de Oliveira Beck; Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez; Henrique Faria Ramos; Amanda Costa Rossi; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Rubens de Brito
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Attentional Modulation of Envelope-Following Responses at Lower (93-109 Hz) but Not Higher (217-233 Hz) Modulation Rates.

Authors:  Emma Holmes; David W Purcell; Robert P Carlyon; Hedwig E Gockel; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-10-02

7.  Steady-state auditory evoked responses in audiological diagnosis in children: a comparison with brainstem evoked auditory responses.

Authors:  Gabriela Ribeiro Ivo Rodrigues; Doris Ruth Lewis; Silvia Nápole Fichino
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Jan-Feb
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.