Literature DB >> 15604475

Detection of Anaplasma marginale DNA in larvae of Boophilus microplus ticks by polymerase chain reaction.

Márcia Kiyoe Shimada1, Milton Hissashi Yamamura, Paula Miyuki Kawasaki, Kátia Tamekuni, Michelle Igarashi, Odilon Vidotto, Marilda Carlos Vidotto.   

Abstract

Boophilus microplus larvae from two different sources were used for the detection of Anaplasma marginale DNA: larvae A, which were collected from a pasture of an endemic farm, and larvae B, which originated from engorged female ticks fed on calves with no clinical signs of disease and with low rickettsemia (approximately 0.01 to 1.0%). Larvae A were collected monthly, from January to May in 2001. Two hundred engorged female ticks fed on calves that provided larvae B were divided into groups of 10 and kept in a controlled environment at either 18 degrees C or 28 degrees C. Fifty larvae were used from each sample for DNA extraction, and 5 muL of DNA were submitted to amplification of the sequence of msp5 gene of A. marginale by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Seven out of 50 samples of larvae A (14%) were positive for the presence of DNA of A. marginale showing amplified product of 457 bp. Ten out of 91 samples of larvae B (11%) kept at 18 degrees C were positive, and all larvae B at 28 degrees C were negative. Thus, this study confirmed the presence of A. marginale DNA in B. microplus larvae by PCR. The EcoRI restriction enzyme analysis confirmed the specificity of the amplicon, which resulted in two fragments: 265 bp and 192 bp. The sequencing analysis of the amplicon from larvae demonstrated 98% homology with the msp5 sequence from Florida A. marginale strain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604475     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1307.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  5 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of South Indian field isolates of bovine Babesia spp. and Anaplasma spp.

Authors:  Rangapura Kariyappa Pradeep; Murikoli Nimisha; Meethalae Koombayil Sruthi; Pakideery Vidya; Birur Mallappa Amrutha; Prashant Somalingappa Kurbet; Karapparambu Gopalan Ajith Kumar; Anju Varghese; Chundayil Kalarikkal Deepa; Chemmangattuvalappil Narendranath Dinesh; Leena Chandrasekhar; Sanis Juliet; Puthenparambil Ramakrishnan Pradeepkumar; Chintu Ravishankar; Srikant Ghosh; Reghu Ravindran
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.289

2.  Rickettsial agents in Egyptian ticks collected from domestic animals.

Authors:  Amanda D Loftis; Will K Reeves; Daniel E Szumlas; Magda M Abbassy; Ibrahim M Helmy; John R Moriarity; Gregory A Dasch
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Seroprevalence estimation and management factors associated with high herd seropositivity for Anaplasma marginale in commercial dairy farms of Puerto Rico.

Authors:  J H Urdaz-Rodríguez; G T Fosgate; A R Alleman; D O Rae; G A Donovan; P Melendez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 1.559

4.  Vector competence of Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu stricto for Anaplasma platys.

Authors:  Alyssa N Snellgrove; Inna Krapiunaya; Shelby L Ford; Hannah M Stanley; Alexandra G Wickson; Kris L Hartzer; Michael L Levin
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.744

5.  Anaplasma Infection in Ticks, Livestock and Human in Ghaemshahr, Mazandaran Province, Iran.

Authors:  Nasibeh Hosseini-Vasoukolaei; Mohammad Ali Oshaghi; Parviz Shayan; Hassan Vatandoost; Farhang Babamahmoudi; Mohammad Reza Yaghoobi-Ershadi; Zakkyeh Telmadarraiy; Fatemeh Mohtarami
Journal:  J Arthropod Borne Dis       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 1.198

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.