Literature DB >> 15604031

Food acceptability in field studies with US army men and women: relationship with food intake and food choice after repeated exposures.

Cees de Graaf1, F Matthew Kramer, Herbert L Meiselman, Larry L Lesher, Carol Baker-Fulco, Edward S Hirsch, John Warber.   

Abstract

Laboratory data with single exposures showed that palatability has a positive relationship with food intake. The question addressed in this study is whether this relationship also holds over repeated exposures in non-laboratory contexts in more natural environments. The data were collected in four field studies, lasting 4-11 days with 307 US Army men and 119 Army women, and comprised 5791 main meals and 8831 snacks in total. Acceptability was rated on the nine point hedonic scale, and intake was registered in units of 1/4, 1/2, 3/4, or 1 or more times of the provided portion size. Correlation coefficients between individual acceptability ratings and intakes varied from 0.22 to 0.62 for the main meals (n=193-2267), and between 0.13 and 0.56 for the snacks (n=304-2967). The likelihood of choosing a meal for the second time was positively related to the acceptability rating of the meal when it was consumed for the first time. The results reinforce the importance of liking in food choice and food intake/choice behavior. However, the magnitude of the correlation coefficients between acceptability ratings and food intake suggest that environmental factors also have an important role in determining intake and choice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15604031     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  9 in total

1.  An augmented food strategy leads to complete energy compensation during a 15-day military training expedition in the cold.

Authors:  Keyne Charlot; Didier Chapelot; Julien Siracusa; Chloé Lavoué; Philippe Colin; Pauline Oustric; David Thivel; Graham Finlayson; Cyprien Bourrilhon
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-06

2.  Evoked emotions predict food choice.

Authors:  Jelle R Dalenberg; Swetlana Gutjar; Gert J Ter Horst; Kees de Graaf; Remco J Renken; Gerry Jager
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The bogus taste test: Validity as a measure of laboratory food intake.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Ashleigh Haynes; Charlotte A Hardman; Eva Kemps; Suzanne Higgs; Andrew Jones
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  Comparison of dietary intakes of Canadian Armed Forces personnel consuming field rations in acute hot, cold, and temperate conditions with standardized infantry activities.

Authors:  Mavra Ahmed; Iva Mandic; Wendy Lou; Len Goodman; Ira Jacobs; Mary R L'Abbé
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-08-16

5.  The effect of personal relative deprivation on food choice: An experimental approach.

Authors:  Sofie van Rongen; Michel Handgraaf; Maaike Benoist; Emely de Vet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Influence of Sensory Properties in Moderating Eating Behaviors and Food Intake.

Authors:  Ciarán G Forde; Kees de Graaf
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-21

7.  Effects of easy-to-use protein-rich energy bar on energy balance, physical activity and performance during 8 days of sustained physical exertion.

Authors:  Minna M Tanskanen; Klaas R Westerterp; Arja L Uusitalo; Mustafa Atalay; Keijo Häkkinen; Hannu O Kinnunen; Heikki Kyröläinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Liking food less: the impact of social influence on food liking evaluations in female students.

Authors:  Eric Robinson; Suzanne Higgs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Impact of chemotherapy on perceptions related to food intake in women with breast cancer: A prospective study.

Authors:  Eduarda da Costa Marinho; Isis Danyelle Dias Custódio; Isabela Borges Ferreira; Cibele Aparecida Crispim; Carlos Eduardo Paiva; Yara Cristina de Paiva Maia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.