Literature DB >> 15603633

Diagnosis and categorization of acral melanocytic lesions using teledermoscopy.

Domenico Piccolo1, H Peter Soyer, Sergio Chimenti, Giuseppe Argenziano, Igor Bartenjev, Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof, Raffaele Marchetti, Shinji Oguchi, Gianluca Pagnanelli, Maria Antonietta Pizzichetta, Toshiaki Saida, Isabella Salvemini, Masaru Tanaka, Ingrid H Wolf, Borut Zgavec, Ketty Peris.   

Abstract

We performed a multicentre study to test the validity of teledermoscopy for diagnosing acral melanoma and to evaluate inter-observer agreement on the classification of acral melanocytic lesions. Dermoscopic images of 77 acral melanocytic lesions (71 common melanocytic naevi and 6 melanomas) were sent by email to 11 dermatologists with different degrees of experience in dermoscopy. The observers analysed the images on a computer monitor to diagnose acral melanoma or atypical lesions and to categorize all lesions. All 11 observers, regardless of their degree of experience, obtained high values for sensitivity (mean 0.91, SD 0.09) and specificity (mean 0.95, SD 0.04) with regard to the diagnosis of melanoma. The inter-observer agreement was good to excellent (kappa 0.49-0.88) for the categorization of acral melanocytic lesions. All six melanomas were correctly classified as 'atypical pattern' and all observers recommended surgical excision. Teledermoscopy represents a useful tool for the diagnosis of acral melanoma and for the categorization of patterns that suggest benign or potentially malignant acral melanocytic lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15603633     DOI: 10.1258/1357633042602017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.184


  6 in total

1.  Comparing High Definition Live Interactive and Store-and-Forward Consultations to In-Person Examinations.

Authors:  Richard Marchell; Craig Locatis; Gene Burges; Richard Maisiak; Wei-Li Liu; Michael Ackerman
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 3.536

2.  Frequency of Publication of Dermoscopic Images in Inter-observer Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sam Polesie; Oscar Zaar
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.875

3.  Diagnostic Reliability of In-Person Versus Remote Dermatology: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mrigendra Bastola; Craig Locatis; Paul Fontelo
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Visual inspection and dermoscopy, alone or in combination, for diagnosing keratinocyte skin cancers in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Rubeta N Matin; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Alana Durack; Abha Gulati; Sue Ann Chan; Louise Johnston; Susan E Bayliss; Jo Leonardi-Bee; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Colette O'Sullivan; Hamid Tehrani; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

5.  Dermoscopy, with and without visual inspection, for diagnosing melanoma in adults.

Authors:  Jacqueline Dinnes; Jonathan J Deeks; Naomi Chuchu; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Rubeta N Matin; David R Thomson; Kai Yuen Wong; Roger Benjamin Aldridge; Rachel Abbott; Monica Fawzy; Susan E Bayliss; Matthew J Grainge; Yemisi Takwoingi; Clare Davenport; Kathie Godfrey; Fiona M Walter; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04

6.  Teledermatology for diagnosing skin cancer in adults.

Authors:  Naomi Chuchu; Jacqueline Dinnes; Yemisi Takwoingi; Rubeta N Matin; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport; Jacqueline F Moreau; Oliver Bassett; Kathie Godfrey; Colette O'Sullivan; Fiona M Walter; Richard Motley; Jonathan J Deeks; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.