Literature DB >> 15602747

Perineural invasion in prostate cancer biopsies is not associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins.

Glenn M Cannon1, Charles R Pound, Douglas P Landsittel, Sheldon I Bastacky, Rajiv Dhir, Michael J Becich, Joel B Nelson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High rates of extracapsular tumor extension have been reported with biopsy perineural invasion (PNI), leading some to advocate routine resection of the ipsilateral neurovascular bundle (NVB) with radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) to assure negative surgical margins. The contemporary rates of extracapsular tumor extension (ECE) and margin status associated with biopsy PNI were investigated.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prostate needle biopsies, RRP specimens, and operative reports of 452 consecutive patients undergoing RRP by a single surgeon were reviewed to determine the presence of PNI invasion, presence of ECE, margin status, and preservation of NVB. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they underwent preoperative hormonal ablation or if their original biopsy was not reviewed by the pathologists at our institution. Both univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the effect of PNI on extracapsular extension, the likelihood of performing a bilateral nerve-sparing technique, and the result of a positive surgical margin.
RESULTS: In the 402 evaluable cases, based on multivariate models PNI showed only a marginal association with positive surgical margin (+SM) (P = 0.10) and bilateral nerve-sparing (B-NS) (P = 0.07), but was significantly associated with organ confinement (P = 0.03). The odds ratio (OR) of PNI for +SM, although not statistically significant, was 0.36. Although showing a higher level of statistical significance, PNI for OC had an odds ratio of 0.50. Similarly, the odds ratio was 0.54 for B-NS.
CONCLUSIONS: Although biopsy PNI alone was associated with a higher probability of ECE, it is not predictive of bilateral nerve-sparing technique or a positive surgical margin in an individual patient. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15602747     DOI: 10.1002/pros.20197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  4 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy perineural invasion is not independently associated with positive surgical margins following radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Benjamin T Ristau; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Yi-Fan Chen; Marnie Bertolet; Elen Woldemichael; Joel B Nelson
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Biological correlates of prostate cancer perineural invasion diameter.

Authors:  Adriana Olar; Dandan He; Diego Florentin; Yi Ding; Thomas Wheeler; Gustavo Ayala
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Guideline for optimization of surgical and pathological quality performance for radical prostatectomy in prostate cancer management: evidentiary base.

Authors:  Joseph L Chin; John Srigley; Linda A Mayhew; R Bryan Rumble; Claire Crossley; Amber Hunter; Neil Fleshner; Bish Bora; Robin McLeod; Sheila McNair; Bernard Langer; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Relationship Between Perineural Invasion in Prostate Needle Biopsy Specimens and Pathologic Staging After Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Hassan Niroomand; Mohammadreza Nowroozi; Mohsen Ayati; Hassan Jamshidian; Amir Arbab; Seyed Ali Momeni; Alireza Ghadian; Hamidreza Ghorbani
Journal:  Nephrourol Mon       Date:  2016-03-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.