AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Insulin has nitric-oxide-dependent vasodilatory effects in muscle, including capillary recruitment, that enhance access for itself and glucose. However, nitric-oxide-dependent vasodilators other than methacholine do not enhance insulin action. Our hypothesis is that methacholine, unlike bradykinin, enhances insulin-mediated glucose uptake in muscle by augmenting capillary recruitment. METHODS: Local infusion of either methacholine or bradykinin into one leg of the anaesthetised rat was made during physiological insulin (3 mU.kg(-1).min(-1)) infusion under euglycaemic conditions and without affecting systemic blood pressure. Whole-body glucose infusion was determined, as was femoral blood flow, 2-deoxyglucose uptake into calf muscles and the metabolism of infused 1-methylxanthine, a measure of capillary recruitment for each leg. RESULTS: Methacholine alone (0.3 micromol.l(-1)) increased femoral arterial blood flow, increased capillary recruitment but had no effect on 2-deoxyglucose uptake of the test leg relative to the contra-lateral control leg. Insulin alone (systemically) required a glucose infusion rate of 8.7 mg.kg(-1).min(-1) to maintain euglycaemia, increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake and capillary recruitment, but was without effect on femoral blood flow in either leg. Local methacholine with systemic insulin infusion increased femoral blood flow, 2-deoxyglucose uptake and capillary recruitment in the test leg only. Bradykinin (0.07 micromol.l(-1)), alone or with insulin, administered in a manner that increased femoral blood flow similarly to methacholine, did not affect 2-deoxyglucose uptake or capillary recruitment. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Methacholine but not bradykinin enhances insulin-mediated muscle glucose uptake in vivo. We conclude that methacholine acts at specific sites in the vasculature of muscle to stimulate capillary recruitment and thereby enhance insulin access.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Insulin has nitric-oxide-dependent vasodilatory effects in muscle, including capillary recruitment, that enhance access for itself and glucose. However, nitric-oxide-dependent vasodilators other than methacholine do not enhance insulin action. Our hypothesis is that methacholine, unlike bradykinin, enhances insulin-mediated glucose uptake in muscle by augmenting capillary recruitment. METHODS: Local infusion of either methacholine or bradykinin into one leg of the anaesthetised rat was made during physiological insulin (3 mU.kg(-1).min(-1)) infusion under euglycaemic conditions and without affecting systemic blood pressure. Whole-body glucose infusion was determined, as was femoral blood flow, 2-deoxyglucose uptake into calf muscles and the metabolism of infused 1-methylxanthine, a measure of capillary recruitment for each leg. RESULTS:Methacholine alone (0.3 micromol.l(-1)) increased femoral arterial blood flow, increased capillary recruitment but had no effect on 2-deoxyglucose uptake of the test leg relative to the contra-lateral control leg. Insulin alone (systemically) required a glucose infusion rate of 8.7 mg.kg(-1).min(-1) to maintain euglycaemia, increased 2-deoxyglucose uptake and capillary recruitment, but was without effect on femoral blood flow in either leg. Local methacholine with systemic insulin infusion increased femoral blood flow, 2-deoxyglucose uptake and capillary recruitment in the test leg only. Bradykinin (0.07 micromol.l(-1)), alone or with insulin, administered in a manner that increased femoral blood flow similarly to methacholine, did not affect 2-deoxyglucose uptake or capillary recruitment. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:Methacholine but not bradykinin enhances insulin-mediated muscle glucose uptake in vivo. We conclude that methacholine acts at specific sites in the vasculature of muscle to stimulate capillary recruitment and thereby enhance insulin access.
Authors: Michael G Clark; Michelle G Wallis; Eugene J Barrett; Michelle A Vincent; Stephen M Richards; Lucy H Clerk; Stephen Rattigan Journal: Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 4.310
Authors: A Natali; R Bonadonna; D Santoro; A Q Galvan; S Baldi; S Frascerra; C Palombo; S Ghione; E Ferrannini Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Lei Zhang; Michelle A Vincent; Stephen M Richards; Lucy H Clerk; Stephen Rattigan; Michael G Clark; Eugene J Barrett Journal: Diabetes Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Ryan D Russell; Katherine M Roberts-Thomson; Donghua Hu; Timothy Greenaway; Andrew C Betik; Lewan Parker; James E Sharman; Stephen M Richards; Stephen Rattigan; Dino Premilovac; Glenn D Wadley; Michelle A Keske Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Lauren Carmichael; Michelle A Keske; Andrew C Betik; Lewan Parker; Barbara Brayner; Katherine M Roberts-Thomson; Glenn D Wadley; D Lee Hamilton; Gunveen Kaur Journal: Nutr Diabetes Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 4.725
Authors: Eloise A Bradley; Lei Zhang; Amanda J Genders; Stephen M Richards; Stephen Rattigan; Michelle A Keske Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2015-07-22 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Juan M Murias; Adwitia Dey; Oscar A Campos; Mehrbod Estaki; Katharine E Hall; Christopher W J Melling; Earl G Noble Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-19 Impact factor: 3.240