Literature DB >> 15602105

Evidence-based review of patient-reported outcomes with botulinum toxin type A.

Joseph Jankovic1, Alberto Esquenazi, Darcy Fehlings, Fred Freitag, Amy M Lang, Markus Naumann.   

Abstract

This review systematically examines the effects of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) on patient-reported outcomes across disorders using evidence-based criteria. The evidence provided by these studies ranged from randomized, controlled trials to case series. The effects of BTX-A on quality of life or global treatment outcomes were assessed in 48 studies across 16 different conditions. All but 7 of these reported benefits of BTX-A over baseline or the comparator condition (placebo or other treatment). The effects of BTX-A on impairment, activities, or participation were assessed in 46 studies across 17 different conditions. All but 4 reported benefits of BTX-A over baseline or the comparison group. The effects of BTX-A on satisfaction or preference were assessed in 14 studies across 11 different conditions, all of which reported high rates of satisfaction with BTX-A or preference over the comparator. These studies provide evidence that BTX-A exerts meaningful benefits on the quality of life of patients treated with this biologic agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15602105     DOI: 10.1097/01.wnf.0000145508.84389.87

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neuropharmacol        ISSN: 0362-5664            Impact factor:   1.592


  3 in total

Review 1.  Botulinum toxin therapy for cervical dystonia.

Authors:  J Jankovic
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.911

2.  Comparative Pharmacodynamics of Three Different Botulinum Toxin Type A Preparations following Repeated Intramuscular Administration in Mice.

Authors:  Jaeyoon Byun; Seongsung Kwak; Jin-Hee Kwon; Minhee Shin; Dong-Kyu Lee; Chang-Hoon Rhee; Won-Ho Kang; Jae-Wook Oh; Deu John M Cruz
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Conversion Ratio between Botox®, Dysport®, and Xeomin® in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Francesco Scaglione
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 4.546

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.