Literature DB >> 15601557

[Phase III randomized clinical trial of intratumoral injection of E1B gene-deleted adenovirus (H101) combined with cisplatin-based chemotherapy in treating squamous cell cancer of head and neck or esophagus].

Zhong-Jun Xia1, Jian-Hua Chang, Li Zhang, Wen-Qi Jiang, Zhong-Zhen Guan, Ji-Wei Liu, Yang Zhang, Xiao-Hua Hu, Guo-Hua Wu, Hua-Qing Wang, Zheng-Chang Chen, Jian-Chao Chen, Qing-Hua Zhou, Jian-Wei Lu, Qing-Xia Fan, Jian-Jin Huang, Xiao Zheng.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND &
OBJECTIVE: H101 is an E1B-55 kDa gene-deleted replication-selective adenovirus, which showed a significant antitumor activity. This study was to compare effects and toxicities of intratumoral H101 injection combined with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) regimen or adriamycin plus 5-fluorouracil (AF) regimen versus PF or AF regimen alone in treating patients with head and neck or esophagus squamous cell cancer.
METHODS: A total of 160 patients were recruited. PF regimen (cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients have no history of PF chemotherapy,or sensitive to PF chemotherapy,while AF regimen (adriamycin 50 mg/m(2) iv,d1; 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2) ivgtt, qd x 5d) was administered to patients didn't response to PF regimen. All patients were randomized to either receive intratumoral H101 injection (5.0 x 10(11)-1.5 x 10(12) VP/day for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks) or not. Treatment repeated every 3 weeks,all patients have to receive at least 2 cycles of chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Among 123 accordant patients,overall response rate of PF plus H101 group (group A1) was 78.8% (41/52),of PF alone group (group B1) was 39.6% (21/53),of AF plus H101 group (group A2) was 50.0% (7/14),of AF alone group (group B2) was 50.0% (2/4). Differences of response rates between group A1 and group B1,between group A1+A2 and group B1+B2 were significant (P=0.000). Main side effects were fever (45.7%), injection site reaction (28.3%),and influenza-like symptoms (9.8%).
CONCLUSION: Intratumoral H101 injection showed a distinct efficacy in patients with squamous cell cancer of head and neck or esophagus,and was relatively safe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15601557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ai Zheng


  79 in total

Review 1.  Oncolytic Virotherapy for the Treatment of Malignant Glioma.

Authors:  Paul M Foreman; Gregory K Friedman; Kevin A Cassady; James M Markert
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  E1A-expressing adenoviral E3B mutants act synergistically with chemotherapeutics in immunocompetent tumor models.

Authors:  S C Cheong; Y Wang; J-H Meng; R Hill; K Sweeney; D Kirn; N R Lemoine; G Halldén
Journal:  Cancer Gene Ther       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 5.987

3.  Biodistribution Analysis of Oncolytic Adenoviruses in Patient Autopsy Samples Reveals Vascular Transduction of Noninjected Tumors and Tissues.

Authors:  Anniina Koski; Simona Bramante; Anja Kipar; Minna Oksanen; Juuso Juhila; Lotta Vassilev; Timo Joensuu; Anna Kanerva; Akseli Hemminki
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 11.454

4.  Phase I clinical trial of locoregional administration of the oncolytic adenovirus ONYX-015 in combination with mitomycin-C, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy in patients with advanced sarcomas.

Authors:  Mateusz Opyrchal; Ileana Aderca; Evanthia Galanis
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2009

5.  The role of JNK phosphorylation as a molecular target to enhance adenovirus replication, oncolysis and cancer therapeutic efficacy.

Authors:  Stephen L Wechman; Xiao-Mei Rao; Jorge G Gomez-Gutierrez; Heshan Sam Zhou; Kelly M McMasters
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 6.  Emerging drugs for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Yihui Wen; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Expert Opin Emerg Drugs       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Immune recruitment and therapeutic synergy: keys to optimizing oncolytic viral therapy?

Authors:  Jay D Naik; Christopher J Twelves; Peter J Selby; Richard G Vile; John D Chester
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Reovirus: a targeted therapeutic--progress and potential.

Authors:  Radhashree Maitra; Mohammad H Ghalib; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 9.  New viruses for cancer therapy: meeting clinical needs.

Authors:  Tanner S Miest; Roberto Cattaneo
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  Gene medicine for cancer treatment: commercially available medicine and accumulated clinical data in China.

Authors:  Guangyu Ma; Hideaki Shimada; Kenzo Hiroshima; Yuji Tada; Nobuo Suzuki; Masatoshi Tagawa
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 4.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.