Literature DB >> 15601404

Supporting peritoneal dialysis in remote Australia.

Dale Carruthers1, Kevin Warr.   

Abstract

Peritoneal dialysis is usually considered a first-choice treatment for end-stage renal disease for patients living in remote areas. The advantages of peritoneal dialysis over haemodialysis are that peritoneal dialysis preserves the residual renal function for longer, provides patients with more independence and gives patients a greater opportunity to return home quickly. In Australia, Aboriginal people suffer end-stage renal failure at disproportionately higher rates than the general population. Given that many Aboriginal people live in remote communities a task of peritoneal dialysis units is to ensure the successful setting up and maintenance of peritoneal dialysis programmes in the outback. This paper examines how peritoneal dialysis units located in the city are able to deliver peritoneal dialysis to patients located often hundreds of kilometres and at times thousands of kilometres away in very remote communities. In preparing this paper interviews were conducted with renal and remote community-based health professionals in Western Australia and the Northern Territory, and with peritoneal dialysis patients in Western Australia. The success of remote peritoneal dialysis programmes relies on many elements, most importantly an integrated approach to care by all members of the peritoneal dialysis team. The peritoneal dialysis team included not just health professionals but also patients, their families, their communities and other support people such as those involved in the transport of peritoneal dialysis supplies to the outback. Careful communication, a willingness to participate, friendliness and delivering care and supplies with a smile are essential ingredients to a winning program. Without all of these ingredients dialysis in the bush may fail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15601404     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2004.00348.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephrology (Carlton)        ISSN: 1320-5358            Impact factor:   2.506


  3 in total

1.  Facilitators and Barriers to Care in Rural Emergency Departments in Alberta for Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis (PD): An Interpretive Descriptive Study.

Authors:  Lisa Lillebuen; Kara Schick-Makaroff; Stephanie Thompson; Anita Molzahn
Journal:  Can J Kidney Health Dis       Date:  2020-11-04

2.  Impact of individual and environmental socioeconomic status on peritoneal dialysis outcomes: a retrospective multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Rong Xu; Qing-Feng Han; Tong-Ying Zhu; Ye-Ping Ren; Jiang-Hua Chen; Hui-Ping Zhao; Meng-Hua Chen; Jie Dong; Yue Wang; Chuan-Ming Hao; Rui Zhang; Xiao-Hui Zhang; Mei Wang; Na Tian; Hai-Yan Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Difficult conversations: Australian Indigenous patients' views on kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jeannie Devitt; Kate Anderson; Joan Cunningham; Cilla Preece; Paul Snelling; Alan Cass
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.388

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.