G Grossmann1, N Marx, J Spiess, M Kochs. 1. Abteilung für Kardiologie, Medizinische Klinik der Universität Ulm, Robert-Koch-Strasse 8, 89081 Ulm, Germany. georg.grossmann@medizin.uni-ulm.de
Abstract
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the underlying mechanism of mitral regurgitation influences the reliability of the proximal flow con- vergence method to assess the regurgitant volume. Furthermore, the mode of imaging the flow convergence region and different correction algorithms for calculation of the regurgitant volume were compared. METHODS: Regurgitant volume was assessed in 45 patients (age 61+/-13 years) with organic (n=19) and functional (n=26) mitral regurgitation by the proximal flow convergence method for aliasing velocities between 14 and 64 cm/s using two-dimensional color Doppler imaging. Different correction and calculation algorithms were compared. In addition, regurgitant volume was determined using color Doppler M-mode for an aliasing velocity of 28 cm/s. The quantitative Doppler method was used as reference. RESULTS: In organic mitral regurgitation correlation coefficients (mean differences) between the proximal flow convergence method and the reference method were 0.25-0.43/ 0.58-0.67 (46-111 ml/15-17 ml) before/after geometric correction of the regurgitant volume for the aliasing velocities investigated. The correlation coefficient (mean difference) using color Doppler M-mode imaging was 0.68 (85 ml). The corresponding values in functional mitral regurgitation were 0.74-0.88/0.74-0.88 (-5-8 ml/-7-5 ml) for two-dimensional color Doppler and 0.88 (-1 ml) for M-mode imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The regurgitant volume was overestimated by the proximal flow convergence method in organic mitral regurgitation irrespective of the application of different correction algorithms or the use of color Doppler M-mode. A sufficiently reliable determination of the regurgitant volume by the proximal flow convergence method was possible in functional mitral regurgitation. In that case a simplified calculation of the regurgitant volume based on the proximal flow convergence method was feasible.
UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the underlying mechanism of mitral regurgitation influences the reliability of the proximal flow con- vergence method to assess the regurgitant volume. Furthermore, the mode of imaging the flow convergence region and different correction algorithms for calculation of the regurgitant volume were compared. METHODS: Regurgitant volume was assessed in 45 patients (age 61+/-13 years) with organic (n=19) and functional (n=26) mitral regurgitation by the proximal flow convergence method for aliasing velocities between 14 and 64 cm/s using two-dimensional color Doppler imaging. Different correction and calculation algorithms were compared. In addition, regurgitant volume was determined using color Doppler M-mode for an aliasing velocity of 28 cm/s. The quantitative Doppler method was used as reference. RESULTS: In organic mitral regurgitation correlation coefficients (mean differences) between the proximal flow convergence method and the reference method were 0.25-0.43/ 0.58-0.67 (46-111 ml/15-17 ml) before/after geometric correction of the regurgitant volume for the aliasing velocities investigated. The correlation coefficient (mean difference) using color Doppler M-mode imaging was 0.68 (85 ml). The corresponding values in functional mitral regurgitation were 0.74-0.88/0.74-0.88 (-5-8 ml/-7-5 ml) for two-dimensional color Doppler and 0.88 (-1 ml) for M-mode imaging. CONCLUSIONS: The regurgitant volume was overestimated by the proximal flow convergence method in organic mitral regurgitation irrespective of the application of different correction algorithms or the use of color Doppler M-mode. A sufficiently reliable determination of the regurgitant volume by the proximal flow convergence method was possible in functional mitral regurgitation. In that case a simplified calculation of the regurgitant volume based on the proximal flow convergence method was feasible.
Authors: G S Bargiggia; L Tronconi; D J Sahn; F Recusani; A Raisaro; S De Servi; L M Valdes-Cruz; C Montemartini Journal: Circulation Date: 1991-10 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Pu; P M Vandervoort; B P Griffin; D Y Leung; W J Stewart; D M Cosgrove; J D Thomas Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-10-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: E Schwammenthal; C Chen; M Giesler; A Sagie; J L Guerrero; J A Vazquez de Prada; V Hombach; A E Weyman; R A Levine Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 1996-01 Impact factor: 24.094