Literature DB >> 15599119

When a "quality measure" may not be what it seems: the national committee for quality assurance report and hypertension control.

John W Graves1, Sheldon G Sheps.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2004        PMID： 15599119      PMCID： PMC8109583          DOI： 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03642.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN： 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Auscultatory measurement of blood pressure performed by the doctor on duty.

Authors:  P E Nielsen; B Oxenboll; K Astvad; F Gyntelberg
Journal:  Acta Med Scand       Date:  1975 Jul-Aug

2.  Terminal digit preference and single-number preference in the Syst-Eur trial: influence of quality control.

Authors:  David Wingfield; Jonathan Cooke; Lut Thijs; Jan A Staessen; Astrid E Fletcher; Robert Fagard; Christopher J Bulpitt
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Blood pressure measurements in the nursing home: are they accurate?

Authors:  H T Stoneking; K M Hla; G P Samsa; J R Feussner
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1992-08

4.  Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?

Authors:  K M Hla; K A Vokaty; J R Feussner
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1986-12

5.  Terminal digit preference, random error, and bias in routine clinical measurement of blood pressure.

Authors:  S W Wen; M S Kramer; J Hoey; J A Hanley; R H Usher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  Sources of error in recording the blood pressure of patients with hypertension in general practice.

Authors:  H R Patterson
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-12-15

7.  Selective recording in blood pressure readings may increase subsequent mortality.

Authors:  D Wingfield; G K Freeman; C J Bulpitt
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2002-09

8.  The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report.

Authors:  Aram V Chobanian; George L Bakris; Henry R Black; William C Cushman; Lee A Green; Joseph L Izzo; Daniel W Jones; Barry J Materson; Suzanne Oparil; Jackson T Wright; Edward J Roccella
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Terminal digit bias in a specialty hypertension faculty practice.

Authors:  S Thavarajah; W B White; G A Mansoor
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.012

10.  National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000: effect of observer training and protocol standardization on reducing blood pressure measurement error.

Authors:  Yechiam Ostchega; Ronald J Prineas; Ryne Paulose-Ram; Carlene M Grim; Grace Willard; Doreen Collins
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.437
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.