Literature DB >> 15598921

Does this woman have osteoporosis?

Amanda D Green1, Cathleen S Colón-Emeric, Lori Bastian, Matthew T Drake, Kenneth W Lyles.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Although recent US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines recommend bone densitometry for all women older than 65 years, identifying younger women at increased risk for osteoporosis and women with occult vertebral fractures remains a clinical challenge. We investigated whether physical signs are useful as a screening tool either for early referral to bone densitometry or for occult spinal fractures.
OBJECTIVE: To review the accuracy and precision of physical examination findings for the diagnosis of osteopenia, osteoporosis, or spinal fracture. DATA SOURCES: We conducted a MEDLINE search for articles published from 1966 through August 2004, manually reviewed bibliographies, consulted 4 clinical skills textbooks, and contacted experts in the field. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if they contained adequate original data on the accuracy or precision of physical examination for diagnosing osteopenia, osteoporosis, or spinal fracture. Two authors screened abstracts found by the search. Fourteen of 191 full articles reviewed met inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently abstracted data from the included studies. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. DATA SYNTHESIS: No single maneuver is sufficient to rule in or rule out osteoporosis or spinal fracture without further testing. The following yielded the greatest positive likelihood ratios (LR+): weight less than 51 kg, LR+, 7.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.0-10.8); tooth count less than 20, LR+, 3.4 (95% CI, 1.4-8.0); rib-pelvis distance less than 2 finger breadths, LR+, 3.8 (95% CI, 2.9-5.1); wall-occiput distance greater than 0 cm, LR+, 4.6 (95% CI, 2.9-7.3), and self-reported humped back, LR+, 3.0 (95% CI, 2.2-4.1).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who do not meet current bone mineral density screening recommendations, several convenient examination maneuvers, especially low weight, can significantly change the pretest probability of osteoporosis and suggest the need for earlier screening. Wall-occiput distance greater than 0 cm and rib-pelvis distance less than 2 fingerbreadths suggest the presence of occult spinal fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15598921     DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.23.2890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  20 in total

1.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Molecular mechanisms of bone 18F-NaF deposition.

Authors:  Johannes Czernin; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Christiaan Schiepers
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Spinal radiographs in those with back pain-when are they appropriate to diagnose vertebral fractures?

Authors:  E M Clark; S R Cummings; J T Schousboe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Radiation-free spinometry adds to the predictive power of historical height loss in clinical vertebral fracture assessment.

Authors:  M Krause; A Lehmann; E Vettorazzi; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  The accuracy of historical height loss for the detection of vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Siminoski; R S Warshawski; H Jen; K Lee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  Osteoporosis: current trends in diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Indira Kulenović; Senija Rasić; Elvedin Kulenović
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 8.  Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Taiwan: summary.

Authors:  Jawl-Shan Hwang; Ding-Cheng Chan; Jung-Fu Chen; Tien-Tsai Cheng; Chih-Hsing Wu; Yung-Kuei Soong; Keh-Sung Tsai; Rong-Sen Yang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Community-based falls prevention: lessons from an Interprofessional Mobility Clinic.

Authors:  Craig A Bauman; James D Milligan; Tejal Patel; Sarah Pritchard; Tammy Labreche; Sharon Dillon-Martin; Alexandra Ilich; John J Riva
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-09

10.  Poverty is a risk factor for osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M C Navarro; M Sosa; P Saavedra; P Lainez; M Marrero; M Torres; C D Medina
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.