Literature DB >> 15598451

Comparison of kinematics in the healthy and ACL injured knee using MRI.

Jennifer M Scarvell1, Paul N Smith, Kathryn M Refshauge, Howard Galloway, Kevin Woods.   

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) was used to examine the characteristics of abnormal motion in the injured knee by mapping tibiofemoral contact. Eleven healthy subjects and 20 subjects with a unilateral ACL injury performed a leg-press against resistance. MRI scans of both knees at 15 degrees intervals from 0 degrees to 90 degrees of flexion were used to record the tibiofemoral contact pattern. The tibiofemoral contact pattern of the injured knees was more posterior on the tibial plateau than the healthy knees, particularly in the lateral compartment. The tibiofemoral contact pattern of the loaded knees did not differ from the unloaded knees. The difference in the tibiofemoral contact pattern in the ACL injured knee was associated with more severe knee symptoms, irrespective of the passive anterior laxity of the knee.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15598451     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  14 in total

1.  The effect of thigh muscle activity on anterior knee laxity in the uninjured and anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee.

Authors:  Massimo G Barcellona; Matthew C Morrissey; Peter Milligan; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Biomechanical techniques to evaluate tibial rotation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Mak-Ham Lam; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Patrick Shu-Hang Yung; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Tibiofemoral Osteoarthritis After Surgical or Nonsurgical Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Kyle P Harris; Jeffrey B Driban; Michael R Sitler; Nicole M Cattano; Easwaran Balasubramanian; Jennifer M Hootman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  In vivo normal knee kinematics: is ethnicity or gender an influencing factor?

Authors:  Filip Leszko; Kristen R Hovinga; Amy L Lerner; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Cervical spine intervertebral kinematics with respect to the head are different during flexion and extension motions.

Authors:  William J Anderst; William F Donaldson; Joon Y Lee; James D Kang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Larger medial femoral to tibial condylar dimension may trigger posterior root tear of medial meniscus.

Authors:  Jun Young Chung; Hyung Keun Song; Myung Kuk Jung; Hyeong Tak Oh; Joon Ho Kim; Ji-Sang Yoon; Byoung-Hyun Min
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Pattern of joint damage in persons with knee osteoarthritis and concomitant ACL tears.

Authors:  Verena Stein; Ling Li; Grace Lo; Ali Guermazi; Yuqing Zhang; C Kent Kwoh; Charles B Eaton; David J Hunter
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  The relation of femoral notch stenosis to ACL tears in persons with knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  V Stein; L Li; A Guermazi; Y Zhang; C Kent Kwoh; C B Eaton; D J Hunter
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Cartilage morphology and T1ρ and T2 quantification in ACL-reconstructed knees: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  F Su; J F Hilton; L Nardo; S Wu; F Liang; T M Link; C B Ma; X Li
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  In vivo motion of femoral condyles during weight-bearing flexion after anterior cruciate ligament rupture using biplane radiography.

Authors:  Kaining Chen; Li Yin; Liangjun Cheng; Chuan Li; Cheng Chen; Liu Yang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.