Literature DB >> 15598192

A comparison of the autonomic arousal of frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers while playing fruit machines.

Crawford Moodie1, Frances Finnigan.   

Abstract

AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to examine differences between frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers in autonomic arousal, as indexed by heart rate, while playing a fruit machine and controlling for the confounding effect of movement.
DESIGN: The experiment employed a between-subjects design, with a total of three groups being investigated-two experimental groups (frequent and infrequent gamblers) and a control group (non-gamblers).
SETTING: To enhance ecological validity the study took place within an actual gambling setting, in Glasgow city centre. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 63 participants, 21 for each of the three groups, who were matched for age and gender, took part in the study. MEASUREMENTS: In terms of autonomic arousal, measurements were taken using a Pulse Oximeter (Pulsox-3I-Minolta Company Limited Milton Keynes, UK). In addition, a questionnaire was employed to measure levels of gambling severity (SOGS).
FINDINGS: Frequent gamblers were found to have significantly higher levels of autonomic arousal than infrequent and non-gamblers, with the frequent gamblers arousal levels continuing to rise after play, unlike the other two groups. Interestingly, novel findings to arise from this research involved the fact that the specialist play characteristics of the fruit machine, such as bonuses, nudges and features, were found to be as arousing as wins.
CONCLUSIONS: The main hypothesis was supported, suggesting that arousal is indeed a key factor in fruit machine gambling. The research has value, as few studies have examined specifically the differences between frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers, and no studies have investigated the arousal associated with the actual dynamics of fruit machine play (i.e. bonuses, nudges, features, wins). The arousal associated with modern British fruit machines suggests a high potential for addiction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15598192     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.00942.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  21 in total

Review 1.  Arousal and gambling mode preference: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Julian Baudinet; Alexander Blaszczynski
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-06

2.  Never smile at a crocodile: betting on electronic gaming machines is intensified by reptile-induced arousal.

Authors:  Matthew J Rockloff; Nancy Greer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-12

Review 3.  Parameters for safer gambling behavior: examining the empirical research.

Authors:  Allyson J Peller; Debi A LaPlante; Howard J Shaffer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2008-05-28

4.  Experimental analysis of the game in pathological gamblers: effect of the immediacy of the reward in slot machines.

Authors:  Mariano Chóliz
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2010-06

5.  Losing more by losing it: poker experience, sensitivity to losses and tilting severity.

Authors:  Jussi Palomäki; Michael Laakasuo; Mikko Salmela
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2014-03

6.  Problem Gambling: One for the Money…?

Authors:  M Flack; M Morris
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

7.  Cue-specific reactivity in experienced gamblers.

Authors:  Edelgard Wulfert; Julie Maxson; Bianca Jardin
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2009-12

8.  Problem gambling in adolescents: an examination of the pathways model.

Authors:  Rina Gupta; Lia Nower; Jeffrey L Derevensky; Alex Blaszczynski; Neda Faregh; Caroline Temcheff
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2013-09

9.  Cue reactivity in active pathological, abstinent pathological, and regular gamblers.

Authors:  Ruthlyn Sodano; Edelgard Wulfert
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2009-08-07

10.  Subtypes of disordered gamblers: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

Authors:  Lia Nower; Silvia S Martins; Keng-Han Lin; Carlos Blanco
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.