Literature DB >> 15598099

Comparative judgments as an alternative to ratings: identifying the scale origin.

Ulf Böckenholt1.   

Abstract

Although comparative judgment methods have a number of distinct advantages over ratings, they share one common problem: On the basis of comparative judgments, it is not possible to recover the origin of item evaluations. One item may be judged more positively than another, but this result does not allow any conclusions about whether either of the items are attractive or unattractive. This article discusses the implications of this limitation for the interpretation of individual differences in comparative judgments. It also presents 3 different methods that may allow determination of the scale origin using a nested model comparison approach. An application illustrates the proposed approach as well as the benefits of determining the scale origin in understanding value judgments. ((c) 2004 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15598099     DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.9.4.453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Methods        ISSN: 1082-989X


  6 in total

1.  A Hierarchical Model for Accuracy and Choice on Standardized Tests.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper; James Joseph Balamuta
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Item Response Models for Forced-Choice Questionnaires: A Common Framework.

Authors:  Anna Brown
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Detecting Heterogeneity of Intervention Effects in Comparative Judgments.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wiedermann; Ulrich Frick; Edgar C Merkle
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2021-03-09

4.  Item Response Theory Models for Ipsative Tests With Multidimensional Pairwise Comparison Items.

Authors:  Wen-Chung Wang; Xue-Lan Qiu; Chia-Wen Chen; Sage Ro; Kuan-Yu Jin
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-04-09

5.  US valuation of the SF-6D.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; A Simon Pickard; Elly Stolk; John E Brazier
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Thurstonian-Based Analyses: Past, Present, and Future Utilities.

Authors:  Ulf Böckenholt
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.