Rupa Patel1, Michael D Stifelman. 1. Department of Urology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) nephrectomy is an increasingly popular surgical modality. Within the last year, three newly designed second-generation hand-assist devices have emerged with the intention to improve efficacy and ease of use. We prospectively evaluated and compared these with each other and with the first-generation devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 130 urologists performed two HAL nephrectomies in a porcine laboratory using two different hand devices at an American Urological Association-sponsored learning course. Sixty-three urologists utilized the second-generation devices (Gelport, Omniport, LapDisc), while 67 urologists used the first-generation devices (Handport, Intromit, PneumoSleeve). Each surgeon completed a 12-question survey evaluating the devices. RESULTS: Evaluation of the second-generation devices revealed that Gelport was statistically significantly superior in all parameters to the Omniport and in 5 of 10 parameters to the LapDisc. Comparison of the first- and second-generation devices revealed that only the Gelport achieved a significant increase in all ratings. Among the first-generation devices, no device scored better than 8.27 of 10 in any category. Analysis of the second-generation devices demonstrated that the Gelport scored a rating above 8.25 in all parameters with an overall satisfaction score of 8.59. Both the Omniport and the LapDisc attained ratings comparable to those of the first-generation devices. CONCLUSION: The HAL procedure relies heavily on devices that allow the hand to be introduced into the laparoscopic environment. The Gelport, when evaluated in a porcine model by training laparoscopic urologists, appears to be significantly better than other devices available to date. Further testing with larger cohorts and human clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL) nephrectomy is an increasingly popular surgical modality. Within the last year, three newly designed second-generation hand-assist devices have emerged with the intention to improve efficacy and ease of use. We prospectively evaluated and compared these with each other and with the first-generation devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 130 urologists performed two HAL nephrectomies in a porcine laboratory using two different hand devices at an American Urological Association-sponsored learning course. Sixty-three urologists utilized the second-generation devices (Gelport, Omniport, LapDisc), while 67 urologists used the first-generation devices (Handport, Intromit, PneumoSleeve). Each surgeon completed a 12-question survey evaluating the devices. RESULTS: Evaluation of the second-generation devices revealed that Gelport was statistically significantly superior in all parameters to the Omniport and in 5 of 10 parameters to the LapDisc. Comparison of the first- and second-generation devices revealed that only the Gelport achieved a significant increase in all ratings. Among the first-generation devices, no device scored better than 8.27 of 10 in any category. Analysis of the second-generation devices demonstrated that the Gelport scored a rating above 8.25 in all parameters with an overall satisfaction score of 8.59. Both the Omniport and the LapDisc attained ratings comparable to those of the first-generation devices. CONCLUSION: The HAL procedure relies heavily on devices that allow the hand to be introduced into the laparoscopic environment. The Gelport, when evaluated in a porcine model by training laparoscopic urologists, appears to be significantly better than other devices available to date. Further testing with larger cohorts and human clinical trials are required to confirm these findings.
Authors: Nishanthan Mahesan; Sirazum M Choudhury; M Shamim Khan; Declan G Murphy; Prokar Dasgupta Journal: Ann R Coll Surg Engl Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 1.891