Literature DB >> 15597589

Twenty-five years' clinical experience with repair of tricuspid insufficiency.

Michel Carrier1, Michel Pellerin, Marie-Claude Guertin, Denis Bouchard, Yves Hébert, Louis P Perrault, Raymond Cartier, Arsène Basmadjian.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Tricuspid regurgitation secondary to pulmonary hypertension due to left-sided heart valve lesions is common. Here, the results are reported of 25 years' experience with three surgical techniques; the De Vega semicircular annuloplasty, the Bex flexible linear reducer, and the Carpentier-Edwards prosthetic ring annuloplasty.
METHODS: Between 1976 and 2002, 463 patients underwent 478 tricuspid annuloplasty procedures to correct valve regurgitation during associated left-sided valve surgery. Patients were followed prospectively at the Montreal Heart Institute Valve Clinic.
RESULTS: A total of 107 patients (23%) underwent the De Vega semicircular annuloplasty, 267 (58%) the Bex flexible linear reducer, and 89 (19%) the Carpentier-Edwards prosthetic ring annuloplasty. Excluding 30-day mortality, the mean 5-, 10- and 15-year patient survival was 82+/-4%, 58+/-6% and 30+/-6% respectively after the De Vega semicircular annuloplasty, 76+/-3%, 54+/-4% and 36+/-6% respectively after the Bex flexible linear reducer, and the mean five-year patient survival was 88+/-4% after the Carpentier-Edwards prosthetic ring annuloplasty (p = 0.65, for comparison of the three survival curves). The mean freedom rate from tricuspid repair failure (clinical right heart failure, redo annuloplasty, tricuspid valve replacement at follow up) was 95+/-3%, 93+/-3% and 72+/-8% at 5, 10 and 15 years respectively after the De Vega semicircular annuloplasty, and 97+/-1%, 87+/-4% and 66+/-9% after the Bex flexible linear reducer. The mean freedom rate from repair failure was 94+/-3% at five years after the Carpentier-Edwards prosthetic ring annuloplasty (p = 0.18 for comparison of the three freedom from failure curves).
CONCLUSION: All three techniques of tricuspid valve repair resulted in a low rate of failure, and in good patient survival at long-term follow up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15597589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  6 in total

Review 1.  Tricuspid regurgitation: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  Rashmi Thapa; Buddhadeb Dawn; Jayant Nath
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Evidence-based surgical management of acquired tricuspid valve disease.

Authors:  Sung Ho Shinn; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 3.  Is a tricuspid annuloplasty ring significantly better than a De Vega's annuloplasty stitch when repairing severe tricuspid regurgitation?

Authors:  Maziar Khorsandi; Amit Banerjee; Harpreet Singh; Aseem R Srivastava
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-28

4.  Heterogeneity of traumatic injury of the tricuspid valve: a report of four cases.

Authors:  Ingrid Schuster; Senta Graf; Ursula Klaar; Rainald Seitelberger; Gerald Mundigler; Thomas Binder
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  A comparison of three tricuspid annuloplasty techniques: Suture, ring, and band.

Authors:  Gökhan Lafçı; Ömer Faruk Çiçek; Ayşe Lafçı; Kerim Esenboğa; Eren Günertem; Ersin Kadiroğulları; Mustafa Cüneyt Çiçek; Adem İlkay Diken; Kerim Çağlı
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 0.332

6.  Flexible band versus rigid ring annuloplasty for functional tricuspid regurgitation.

Authors:  Hironori Izutani; Teruya Nakamura; Kanji Kawachi
Journal:  Heart Int       Date:  2010-12-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.