Literature DB >> 15596812

Systemic priming-boosting immunization with a trivalent plasmid DNA and inactivated murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) vaccine provides long-term protection against viral replication following systemic or mucosal MCMV challenge.

Christopher S Morello1, Ming Ye, Stephanie Hung, Laura A Kelley, Deborah H Spector.   

Abstract

We previously demonstrated that vaccination of BALB/c mice with a pool of 13 plasmid DNAs (pDNAs) expressing murine cytomegalovirus (MCMV) genes followed by formalin-inactivated MCMV (FI-MCMV) resulted in complete protection against viral replication in the spleen and salivary glands following sublethal intraperitoneal (i.p.) challenge. Here, we found that following intranasal (i.n.) challenge, titers of virus in the lungs of the immunized mice were reduced approximately 1,000-fold relative to those for mock-immunized controls. We next sought to extend these results and to determine whether similar protection levels could be achieved by priming with a pool of three pDNAs containing three key plasmids (IE1, M84, and gB). We found that the three-pDNA priming elicited IE1- and M84-p65-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes and, following FI-MCMV boost, high levels of virion-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and virus-neutralizing antibodies. When mice were i.n. challenged 4 months after the last boost, titers of virus in the lungs of immunized mice were reduced 1,000- to 2,000-fold from those for controls during the peak of viral replication. Additionally, titers of virus were either at or below the detection limits for the salivary glands, liver, and spleen of the majority of the immunized mice. Following sublethal i.p. challenge, virus was undetectable in all of the above target organs of the immunized mice. Virion-specific IgA in the lungs was consistently detected by day 6 post-i.n. challenge for the immunized mice and by day 14 for controls. These results demonstrate the immunity and high levels of protection of the priming-boosting vaccination against both systemic and mucosal challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15596812      PMCID: PMC538742          DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.1.159-175.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  64 in total

Review 1.  Human cytomegalovirus glycoproteins.

Authors:  W J Britt; M Mach
Journal:  Intervirology       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.763

Review 2.  Jump-starting the immune system: prime-boosting comes of age.

Authors:  David L Woodland
Journal:  Trends Immunol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 16.687

3.  A neutralizing monoclonal antibody recognizes an 87K envelope glycoprotein on the murine cytomegalovirus virion.

Authors:  L C Loh; L F Qualtiere
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.616

4.  Control of murine cytomegalovirus in the lungs: relative but not absolute immunodominance of the immediate-early 1 nonapeptide during the antiviral cytolytic T-lymphocyte response in pulmonary infiltrates.

Authors:  R Holtappels; J Podlech; G Geginat; H P Steffens; D Thomas; M J Reddehase
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  The cytolytic T lymphocyte response to the murine cytomegalovirus. II. Detection of virus replication stage-specific antigens by separate populations of in vivo active cytolytic T lymphocyte precursors.

Authors:  M J Reddehase; G M Keil; U H Koszinowski
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  Pathogenesis of acute murine cytomegalovirus infection in resistant and susceptible strains of mice.

Authors:  J A Mercer; D H Spector
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Characterization of a major virion envelope glycoprotein complex of murine cytomegalovirus and its immunological cross-reactivity with human cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  L C Loh; N Balachandran; L F Qualtiere
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.616

Review 8.  Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: Current status, known challenges, and future strategies.

Authors:  Michael Boeckh; W Garrett Nichols; Genovefa Papanicolaou; Robert Rubin; John R Wingard; John Zaia
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Multiple epitopes in the murine cytomegalovirus early gene product M84 are efficiently presented in infected primary macrophages and contribute to strong CD8+-T-lymphocyte responses and protection following DNA immunization.

Authors:  Ming Ye; Christopher S Morello; Deborah H Spector
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Molecular cloning and restriction endonuclease mapping of the murine cytomegalovirus genome (Smith Strain).

Authors:  J A Mercer; J R Marks; D H Spector
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.616

View more
  18 in total

1.  Immunization with herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) genes plus inactivated HSV-2 is highly protective against acute and recurrent HSV-2 disease.

Authors:  Christopher S Morello; Michael S Levinson; Kimberly A Kraynyak; Deborah H Spector
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.103

2.  DNA vaccine prime followed by boost with live attenuated virus significantly improves antigen-specific T cell responses against human cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  Anna Gil; Siyuan Shen; Scott Coley; Laura Gibson; Don J Diamond; Shixia Wang; Shan Lu
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Comparison of monovalent glycoprotein B with bivalent gB/pp65 (GP83) vaccine for congenital cytomegalovirus infection in a guinea pig model: Inclusion of GP83 reduces gB antibody response but both vaccine approaches provide equivalent protection against pup mortality.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Swanson; Pete Gillis; Nelmary Hernandez-Alvarado; Claudia Fernández-Alarcón; Megan Schmit; Jason C Zabeli; Felix Wussow; Don J Diamond; Mark R Schleiss
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Preliminary evidence that the novel host-derived immunostimulant EP67 can act as a mucosal adjuvant.

Authors:  Bala Vamsi K Karuturi; Shailendra B Tallapaka; Joy A Phillips; Sam D Sanderson; Joseph A Vetro
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of DNA vaccines expressing rhesus cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B, phosphoprotein 65-2, and viral interleukin-10 in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Yujuan Yue; Amitinder Kaur; Meghan K Eberhardt; Nadine Kassis; Shan Shan Zhou; Alice F Tarantal; Peter A Barry
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Developing a Vaccine against Congenital Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection: What Have We Learned from Animal Models? Where Should We Go Next?

Authors:  Mark R Schleiss
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.831

7.  A heterologous DNA prime/protein boost immunization strategy for rhesus cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  Kristina Abel; Lisa Strelow; Yujuan Yue; Meghan K Eberhardt; Kimberli A Schmidt; Peter A Barry
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  Intranasal immunization with recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus expressing murine cytomegalovirus glycoprotein B induces humoral and cellular immunity.

Authors:  Steven R Wilson; Jean H Wilson; Linda Buonocore; Amy Palin; John K Rose; Jon D Reuter
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.982

Review 9.  Cytomegalovirus vaccine development.

Authors:  M R Schleiss
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.291

10.  Human cytomegalovirus vaccine development: Immune responses to look into vaccine strategy.

Authors:  Lin Xia; Ruopeng Su; Zhiqiang An; Tong-Ming Fu; Wenxin Luo
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 3.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.