Literature DB >> 15596190

Clinical utility of proPSA and "benign" PSA when percent free PSA is less than 15%.

Masood A Khan1, Lori J Sokoll, Daniel W Chan, Leslie A Mangold, Phaedre Mohr, Stephen D Mikolajczyk, Harry J Linton, Cindy L Evans, Harry G Rittenhouse, Alan W Partin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical utility of the subforms of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA), namely proPSA and "benign" PSA (BPSA), to improve cancer detection when the percent free PSA level is less than 15%. Percent free PSA, while maintaining sensitivity, has greatly improved the specificity of PSA for the early detection of prostate cancer. A low percent free PSA value indicates a greater risk of cancer, but only 30% to 50% of men with percent free PSA levels of less than 15% actually have cancer at biopsy.
METHODS: Archived sera from 161 consecutive men who were prospectively enrolled in our Early Detection Research Network prostate cancer early detection biomarker program with a percent free PSA value of less than 15% were included in the study. Total PSA, free PSA, proPSA, and BPSA were measured for each sample.
RESULTS: The mean total PSA was 6.1 ng/mL (range 1.8 to 24.0). The mean age of the study group was 62 +/- 7 years. Prostate cancer was detected in 66 (41%) of 161 men. The area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic for total and percent free PSA was 0.51 and 0.54, respectively. BPSA and proPSA/BPSA both improved cancer detection compared with percent free PSA alone; the improvement was statistically significant (P <0.001) . The area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic for proPSA/BPSA was 0.72, giving a sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 46%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of our preliminary studies have suggested that the ratio of proPSA and BPSA can distinguish cancer with greater accuracy when the percent free PSA value is very low (less than 15%), and may, therefore, provide better clinical utility in this lower range of percent free PSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15596190     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  8 in total

1.  [-2]Proenzyme prostate specific antigen is more accurate than total and free prostate specific antigen in differentiating prostate cancer from benign disease in a prospective prostate cancer screening study.

Authors:  Brian V Le; Christopher R Griffin; Stacy Loeb; Gustavo F Carvalhal; Donghui Kan; Nikola A Baumann; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A prospective, multicenter, National Cancer Institute Early Detection Research Network study of [-2]proPSA: improving prostate cancer detection and correlating with cancer aggressiveness.

Authors:  Lori J Sokoll; Martin G Sanda; Ziding Feng; Jacob Kagan; Isaac A Mizrahi; Dennis L Broyles; Alan W Partin; Sudhir Srivastava; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Zhen Zhang; Daniel W Chan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Benign prostate specific antigen distribution and associations with urological outcomes in community dwelling black and white men.

Authors:  Thomas Rhodes; Debra J Jacobson; Michaela E McGree; Jennifer L St Sauver; Aruna V Sarma; Cynthia J Girman; Michael M Lieber; George G Klee; Kitaw Demissie; Steven J Jacobsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 4.  Biomarkers in prostate cancer surveillance and screening: past, present, and future.

Authors:  K Clint Cary; Mathew R Cooperberg
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2013-12

Review 5.  PSA and beyond: alternative prostate cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Sharanjot Saini
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 6.  Prostate-specific antigen and prostate-specific antigen derivatives as predictors of benign prostatic hyperplasia progression.

Authors:  Jonathan M Levitt; Kevin M Slawin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Significance of atypical small acinar proliferation and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Orhan Koca; Selahattin Calışkan; Metin İshak Oztürk; Mustafa Güneş; M Ihsan Karaman
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17

Review 8.  A new algorithm in patients with elevated and/or rising prostate-specific antigen level, minor lower urinary tract symptoms, and negative multisite prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Koenraad van Renterghem; Gommert Van Koeveringe; Ruth Achten; Philip van Kerrebroeck
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 2.370

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.