Literature DB >> 15595703

A 5-year prospective study of single-tooth replacements supported by the Astra Tech implant: a pilot study.

Klaus Gotfredsen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Implant-supported single-tooth replacements are an increasingly used method to replace teeth, especially in young patients. Therefore, long-term validation of different treatment modalities with different implant systems is of great importance.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to make a biologic, technical, and aesthetic evaluation of single-tooth replacement supported by the Astra Tech implant (Astra Tech AB, Mölndal, Sweden) during a 5-year period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients were divided into two consecutively treated groups. In group A the implants were placed "early" in the extraction sockets, and standard single-tooth abutments were used. In group B the implants were placed "delayed," and preparable abutments were used. Clinical examinations including registration of plaque, bleeding, crown lengths, soft tissue marginal level, papilla height, complications, and radiography were performed yearly. At the 3-year control examination the patient and a dentist evaluated aesthetic appearance with a visual analog scale.
RESULTS: An implant survival rate of 100% and a crown survival rate of 95% over a period of 5 years were found. The mean loss of marginal bone adjacent to implants and neighboring teeth was less than 0.5 mm during the 5-year period, and there was no significant difference after crown placement between the treatment modality for group A and that for B. There were fewer clinical complications and repairs in group B than in group A. Soft tissue dimensions were more natural around implant crowns in group B as compared to group A, but this was not reflected in the patients' satisfaction with aesthetic appearance. On the other hand the dentist judged the restorations in group B higher concerning aesthetics than in group A.
CONCLUSION: Implant-supported single-tooth replacement with the Astra Tech system is a reliable treatment resulting in a good 5-year prognosis and only few complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15595703     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00021.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  5 in total

1.  Outcome of early dental implant placement versus other dental implant placement protocols: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seyed Hossein Bassir; Karim El Kholy; Chia-Yu Chen; Kyu Ha Lee; Giuseppe Intini
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 6.993

2.  Use of separate single-tooth implant restorations to replace two or more consecutive posterior teeth: a prospective cohort study for up to 1 year.

Authors:  Min-Jung Kwon; In-Sung Yeo; Young-Kyun Kim; Yang-Jin Yi; Jae-Ho Yang
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Narrow diameter implants to replace congenital missing maxillary lateral incisors: A 1-year prospective, controlled, clinical study.

Authors:  Andrea Roccuzzo; Jean-Claude Imber; Jakob Lempert; Mandana Hosseini; Simon Storgård Jensen
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 5.021

4.  Findings of a Four-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Two-Piece and One-Piece Zirconia Abutments Supporting Single Prosthetic Restorations in Maxillary Anterior Region.

Authors:  Guerino Paolantoni; Gaetano Marenzi; Andrea Blasi; Jolanda Mignogna; Gilberto Sammartino
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Aesthetic perception of single implants placed in the anterior zone. A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  G Burgueño-Barris; B Cortés-Acha; R Figueiredo; E Valmaseda-Castellón
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-07-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.