Literature DB >> 1559340

Worldwide variations in the lifetime probability of reproductive cancer in women: implications of best-case, worst-case, and likely-case assumptions about the effect of oral contraceptive use.

D B Petitti1, D Porterfield.   

Abstract

Cancer incidence in countries representative of three patterns of reproductive cancer and age-specific mortality was used to estimate the effect of oral contraceptive use on the lifetime probability of reproductive cancer under three sets of assumptions about the effects of oral contraceptives. Under the set of assumptions considered likely, oral contraceptives were estimated to reduce or increase only slightly the lifetime probability of any reproductive cancer in each setting. Under worst-case assumptions, oral contraceptives were estimated to increase the lifetime probability of reproductive cancer only modestly in settings with low cancer rates and in settings with high rates of breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer, but it might have a large impact on lifetime probability of reproductive cancer in settings with high cervical cancer rates. Under best-case assumptions, oral contraceptives were estimated to decrease the lifetime probability of reproductive cancer in each setting; this reduction was estimated to be greatest in settings where endometrial and ovarian cancer incidence are high.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Specific Death Rate; Americas; Asia; Breast Cancer; California; Cancer; Central America; Cervical Cancer; China; Colombia; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Costa Rica; Cross-cultural Comparisons; Death Rate; Demographic Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Developing Countries; Diseases; Eastern Asia; Endometrial Cancer; England; Europe; Family Planning; Incidence; Japan; Latin America; Life Table Method; Life Tables; Measurement; Methodological Studies; Mortality; Neoplasms; North America; Northern America; Northern Europe; Oral Contraceptives; Ovarian Cancer; Population; Population Characteristics; Population Dynamics; Research Methodology; South America; Studies; United Kingdom; United States; Urban Population--women; Wales

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1559340     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90043-s

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  5 in total

1.  Risk of cancer and the oral contraceptive pill.

Authors:  Olav Meirik; Timothy M M Farley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-09-12

2.  The economic value of contraception: a comparison of 15 methods.

Authors:  J Trussell; J A Leveque; J D Koenig; R London; S Borden; J Henneberry; K D LaGuardia; F Stewart; T G Wilson; S Wysocki
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Four decades of research on hormonal contraception.

Authors:  Diana B Petitti; Stephen Sidney
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2005

4.  Use of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices and tubal sterilization and cancer risk in a large prospective study, from 1996 to 2006.

Authors:  Tsogzolmaa Dorjgochoo; Xiao-Ou Shu; Hong-Lan Li; Han-Zhu Qian; Gong Yang; Hui Cai; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Temporal trends in breast cancer presentation in the third world.

Authors:  Stanley N C Anyanwu
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.