Literature DB >> 15593373

Estimating the optimal utilization rates of radiotherapy for hematologic malignancies from a review of the evidence: part II-leukemia and myeloma.

Carolyn Featherstone1, Geoff Delaney, Susannah Jacob, Michael Barton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to estimate the ideal proportion of new patients with leukemia and myeloma who should receive radiotherapy at some time during the course of their illness based on the best evidence.
METHODS: Available evidence of the efficacy of radiotherapy in most clinical situations for leukemia and myeloma was identified through extensive literature reviews and treatment guideline searches. Epidemiologic data concerning the distribution of types, disease stages, and other factors that influence the use of radiotherapy were identified. Decision trees were constructed to merge the evidence-based recommendations with the epidemiological data to calculate the optimal proportion of patients who should receive radiotherapy according to the best available evidence. Actual radiotherapy utilization rates also were identified.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients diagnosed with myeloma in Australia who should receive radiotherapy based on the evidence was 38%. There was wide variation in the proportion of patients who actually received radiotherapy for myeloma from 24% up to 55%. The recommended proportion of patients diagnosed with myeloma in Australia who, according to the best available evidence, should receive at least a single course of radiotherapy was 38%. The proportion of patients diagnosed in Australia with leukemia who should receive radiotherapy at some point in their management, according to the best available evidence, was calculated at 4%, which corresponded with actual practice.
CONCLUSIONS: Further research will be required to determine why more patients who are diagnosed with myeloma are not treated with radiotherapy. (c) 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15593373     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

Review 1.  Second malignancies after multiple myeloma: from 1960s to 2010s.

Authors:  Anish Thomas; Sham Mailankody; Neha Korde; Sigurdur Y Kristinsson; Ingemar Turesson; Ola Landgren
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 2.  [Benefits of radiotherapy for patients with solitary plasmacytoma or multiple myeloma].

Authors:  Laila König; Klaus Herfarth
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  The Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy with Concurrent Dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and Cisplatin-Based Systemic Therapy for Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Anthony D Nehlsen; Kunal K Sindhu; Erin Moshier; Joshua Richter; Shambavi Richard; Ajai Chari; Larysa Sanchez; Samir Parekh; Hearn Jay Cho; Sundar Jagannath; Kavita Dharmarajan
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2021-09-24

Review 4.  Myeloma and Bone Disease.

Authors:  Cristina Panaroni; Andrew J Yee; Noopur S Raje
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Partial remission of acute myeloid leukemia complicating multiple myeloma following COAP chemotherapy: A case report.

Authors:  Man Shen; Wan-Jun Sun; Zhong-Xia Huang; Jia-Jia Zhang; Na An; Xin Li
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced PEEK Intramedullary Nails Defining the Niche.

Authors:  Georges F Vles; Maximillian H Brodermann; Mark A Roussot; James Youngman
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-07-30

7.  The Safety Profile of Concurrent Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in the Modern Era.

Authors:  Lucas Resende Salgado; Shutao Wang; Ava Adler; Sanders Chang; Meng Ru; Erin Moshier; Kavita Dharmarajan; Hearn Jay Cho; Richard Bakst
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.