Literature DB >> 15592672

High expression of costimulatory molecules correlates with low relapse-free survival probability in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).

M Graf1, S Reif, K Hecht, R Pelka-Fleischer, T Kroell, K Pfister, H Schmetzer.   

Abstract

Costimulatory molecules such as lymphocyte function-associated antigen (LFA)-1 (CD11a), LFA-3 (CD58), intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 (CD54), neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) (CD56), B7-1 (CD80), or B7-2 (CD86) are important regulatory elements in healthy immunological cascades, but their role in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has only been rarely investigated. We studied their expression on mononuclear bone marrow (BM) cells from 105 patients with AML at initial diagnosis and evaluated their prognostic significance. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analyses were performed using antibodies directly conjugated with fluorescein. A BM sample was considered positive if more than 20% of the cells in the blast containing gate expressed the respective marker. The surface expression of CD11a (27 of 29 cases positive with an average of 71% positive blasts; 27(+)/29, 71%), CD54 (23(+)/33, 37%), CD56 (24(+)/93, 20%), CD58 (29(+)/29, 95%), CD80 (13(+)/28, 30%), and CD86 (19(+)/29, 39%) was measured. The expression of these markers in different French-American-British (FAB) classification types (M0-M5) was heterogeneous, except for CD56, which showed a higher proportion of positive cells in monocytic subtypes of AML. In addition, cases with a "poor risk" karyotype as well as patients succumbing to "early death" after double induction therapy according to the AML Cooperative Group (CG) protocol were characterized by a high expression of CD56. Relapse-free survival analyses demonstrated that patients with more than 8% CD56(+) cells in the BM relapsed significantly sooner. CD54 was preferentially expressed in AML M4(eo) and in addition in "favorable" cytogenetic risk groups and in cases that had responded to AML-CG therapy. Only very high proportions (>60%) of CD54(+) cells were associated with a lower probability for relapse-free survival. CD80 and CD86 expressions were similar in all FAB types. Patients who had responded to AML-CG therapy showed higher CD80 proportions and lower CD86 proportions compared to the "nonresponder" group. Whereas cases with more than 15% CD80(+) cells had a significantly lower probability for relapse-free survival, only cases with more than 65% CD86(+) were characterized by a significantly lower probability for relapse-free survival. Expression profiles of CD11a and CD58 were not associated with specific FAB types or prognostically relevant groups. We can conclude: (1) Expression of costimulatory molecules in AML is very variable. This reflects the great diversity of immunophenotypes in AML. (2) CD56 is mainly expressed in monocytic subtypes of AML. CD56(+) subtypes of AML seem to be a separate entity with a worse prognosis independent of the karyotype. (3) High expression of some costimulatory molecules correlates with a worse prognosis concerning relapse-free survival times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15592672     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-004-0978-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  15 in total

Review 1.  Immune checkpoint-based therapy in myeloid malignancies: a promise yet to be fulfilled.

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Maximilian Stahl; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.512

Review 2.  Immunomodulatory Drugs: Immune Checkpoint Agents in Acute Leukemia.

Authors:  Hanna A Knaus; Christopher G Kanakry; Leo Luznik; Ivana Gojo
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.465

3.  Adaptive resistance: a tumor strategy to evade immune attack.

Authors:  Sheng Yao; Lieping Chen
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 5.532

4.  Functional exhaustion of CD4+ T cells induced by co-stimulatory signals from myeloid leukaemia cells.

Authors:  Didem Ozkazanc; Digdem Yoyen-Ermis; Ece Tavukcuoglu; Yahya Buyukasik; Gunes Esendagli
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 7.397

5.  Recurrent extramedullary relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a patient with the chromosomal abnormality t(8;21) and CD56-positivity.

Authors:  Toshihiko Ando; Noriyuki Mitani; Kumiko Matsui; Koji Yamashita; Jun Nomiyama; Masatoshi Tsuru; Toshiaki Yujiri; Yukio Tanizawa
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 6.  The emerging role of immune checkpoint based approaches in AML and MDS.

Authors:  Prajwal Boddu; Hagop Kantarjian; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; James Allison; Padmanee Sharma; Naval Daver
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2017-07-06

Review 7.  Novel immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of acute leukemia (myeloid and lymphoblastic).

Authors:  Kazusa Ishii; Austin J Barrett
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2016-02

8.  T-cell ligands modulate the cytolytic activity of the CD33/CD3 BiTE antibody construct, AMG 330.

Authors:  G S Laszlo; C J Gudgeon; K H Harrington; R B Walter
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 11.037

9.  A Jurkat 76 based triple parameter reporter system to evaluate TCR functions and adoptive T cell strategies.

Authors:  Sandra Rosskopf; Judith Leitner; Wolfgang Paster; Laura T Morton; Renate S Hagedoorn; Peter Steinberger; Mirjam H M Heemskerk
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-03

10.  Clinical Courses of Two Pediatric Patients with Acute Megakaryoblastic Leukemia Harboring the CBFA2T3-GLIS2 Fusion Gene.

Authors:  Mayu Ishibashi; Tomoko Yokosuka; Masakatsu D Yanagimachi; Fuminori Iwasaki; Shin-Ichi Tsujimoto; Koji Sasaki; Masanobu Takeuchi; Reo Tanoshima; Hiromi Kato; Ryosuke Kajiwara; Fumiko Tanaka; Hiroaki Goto; Shumpei Yokota
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 1.831

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.