Literature DB >> 15591742

Pulsatility index determination by flowmeter measurement: a new indicator for vascular resistance?

M Aleksic1, J Heckenkamp, M Gawenda, J Brunkwall.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripheral resistance (R) is measured by flow (Q) and a pressure difference (P1-P2), where R equals (P1-P2)/Q. The pulsatility index (PI) has been used to assess peripheral vascular resistance by measuring flow velocities. Alternatively, PI can be expressed by the ratio of the flow volume amplitude and mean flow volume which both are quantified by a flowmeter. While reflected flow due to a distally located stenosis will considerably influence PI, this parameter theoretically could provide a good estimation of resistance. The appropriateness of this presumption has not been evaluated in this setting though, why the correlation of PI in flow recordings was examined by comparing PI with the true R using the stenosis of the internal carotid artery (ICA) as a clinical model.
METHODS: The volume flow in the ICA was measured by a transit-time flowmeter in 400 patients undergoing carotid endarteriectomy. The pressure in the common carotid artery (CCA) proximal to and in the ICA distal to the stenosis was determined by direct puncture allowing the calculation of a pressure gradient (PG) and R in analogy to Ohm's law. R and PI were then correlated using Spearman's correlation.
RESULTS: The blood flow in the ICA ranged from 2 to 478 ml/min with a median value of 165. The median PG was 14 mm Hg (0 to 88). Median R was 0.08 mm Hg x min / ml (0-26.5). PI varied between 0.8 and 114.1 with a mean of 1.9. Since a concentration of R and PI values in the lower ranges was observed, a logarithmic transformation was performed. Log PI showed only weak correlation to log R (r = 0.426, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Log PI was intermediately correlated to log R in carotid artery stenosis, with a low discriminating power in the lower ranges due to the close distribution of measurements. Further studies are required to clarify the role of PI in hemodynamic questions and its general usefulness in other fields of vascular surgery like in peripheral bypass surgery. 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15591742     DOI: 10.1159/000081642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Surg Res        ISSN: 0014-312X            Impact factor:   1.745


  5 in total

1.  Effect of norepinephrine infusion on hepatic blood flow and its interaction with somatostatin: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Jurgen van Limmen; Xavier Iturriagagoitia; Marilie Verougstraete; Piet Wyffels; Frederik Berrevoet; Luís Filipe Abreu de Carvalho; Stefan De Hert; Luc De Baerdemaeker
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 2.376

2.  Intraoperative completion studies in carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Christoph Knappich; Thomas Lang; Pavlos Tsantilas; Sofie Schmid; Michael Kallmayer; Bernhard Haller; Hans-Henning Eckstein
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

3.  Effects of Enhanced External Counterpulsation With Different Sequential Levels on Lower Extremity Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Yahui Zhang; Yujia Zhang; Yinfen Wang; Xiuli Xu; Jing Jin; Xiaodong Zhang; Wei Zhang; Wenbin Wei; Chubin Zhong; Guifu Wu
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-24

4.  Middle Cerebral Artery Pulsatility Index as Predictor of Cognitive Impairment in Hypertensive Patients.

Authors:  Salim Harris; Teuku Reyhan; Yetty Ramli; Joedo Prihartono; Mohammad Kurniawan
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.003

5.  Effects of propofol and sevoflurane on hepatic blood flow: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jurgen van Limmen; Piet Wyffels; Frederik Berrevoet; Aude Vanlander; Laurent Coeman; Patrick Wouters; Stefan De Hert; Luc De Baerdemaeker
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 2.217

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.