BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Induction to high altitude leads to altered central nervous system (CNS) functions induced by hypobaric hypoxia. The sensory systems like visual and auditory systems are reported to be affected by hypoxia. The present study was undertaken to assess the effects of hypobaric hypoxia on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) at 3200 m and 4300 m. METHODS: The VEP of 30 human volunteers were recorded at sea level (SL) and then at high altitude (HA) of 3200 m (HA I) and 4300 m (HA II) in eastern Himalayas and on return to sea level (RSL). The absolute latencies and amplitude of positive and negative waves were recorded. RESULTS: High altitude of 3200 m did not alter the latency of major wave N1, P1 and N2 of the VEPs. At HA II (4300 m), there was a statistically significant increase (P < 0.01) in the latency of NI wave as compared to the SL value and HA I (3200 m) in both left and right eye. There was a slight increase in latenty of P1 wave in both left and right eye at HA II. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: From these results it may be concluded that induction to HA causes increase in latency of N1 wave at 4300 m which is still within physiological limits. This increase in wave latency of N1 wave in both eyes may be due to synaptic delay and/or altered neuronal processing at HA.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES: Induction to high altitude leads to altered central nervous system (CNS) functions induced by hypobaric hypoxia. The sensory systems like visual and auditory systems are reported to be affected by hypoxia. The present study was undertaken to assess the effects of hypobaric hypoxia on visual evoked potentials (VEPs) at 3200 m and 4300 m. METHODS: The VEP of 30 human volunteers were recorded at sea level (SL) and then at high altitude (HA) of 3200 m (HA I) and 4300 m (HA II) in eastern Himalayas and on return to sea level (RSL). The absolute latencies and amplitude of positive and negative waves were recorded. RESULTS: High altitude of 3200 m did not alter the latency of major wave N1, P1 and N2 of the VEPs. At HA II (4300 m), there was a statistically significant increase (P < 0.01) in the latency of NI wave as compared to the SL value and HA I (3200 m) in both left and right eye. There was a slight increase in latenty of P1 wave in both left and right eye at HA II. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: From these results it may be concluded that induction to HA causes increase in latency of N1 wave at 4300 m which is still within physiological limits. This increase in wave latency of N1 wave in both eyes may be due to synaptic delay and/or altered neuronal processing at HA.
Authors: Mathew I B Debenham; Janelle N Smuin; Tess D A Grantham; Philip N Ainslie; Brian H Dalton Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2021-01-23 Impact factor: 3.078