Literature DB >> 1559163

Neglect and visual recognition.

A W Young1, D J Hellawell, J Welch.   

Abstract

B.Q., a right-handed woman who had suffered a stroke affecting the right parietal region, showed visuospatial neglect and problems in recognizing seen objects and faces. Investigation of her visual recognition problems revealed a striking inability to identify the left sides of chimaeric objects and faces. Often, B.Q. would deny that the stimulus was chimaeric at all, and she was remarkably poor (though above chance) at discriminating chimaeric from normal faces. Even when left-sided details had been accurately traced or described, they were often either ignored in reporting the identities of the constituent parts of a chimaeric or assimilated in some way to the information from the right side. Neglect of the left side was more pronounced for chimaerics which approximated an individual face or object. It occurred regardless of the chimaeric's position in B.Q.'s field of vision, and was found with brief (200 ms) presentations of stimuli confined to her (perimetrically intact) right visual field. When chimaeric faces were inverted, B.Q. continued to neglect the side of the chimaeric falling to her left, which implies that the neglect did not operate in entirely object-centered coordinates. However, left-sided information could be used if it was critical in determining the identity of an object or a face. We suggest that this could explain B.Q.'s lack of neglect of individual words, for which left-sided (initial) letters are often crucial to successful recognition. An account of her deficit is proposed, involving an interaction between moderately defective pick-up of left-sided information in an object-based coding system and preserved access to stored representations of familiar visual stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1559163     DOI: 10.1093/brain/115.1.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain        ISSN: 0006-8950            Impact factor:   13.501


  7 in total

1.  The interaction of spatial reference frames and hierarchical object representations: evidence from figure copying in hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  M Behrmann; D C Plaut
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Neural representation of objects in space: a dual coding account.

Authors:  G W Humphreys
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Left of what? The role of egocentric coordinates in neglect.

Authors:  N Beschin; R Cubelli; S Della Sala; L Spinazzola
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.154

Review 4.  Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events.

Authors:  M M Mesulam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Tonic and phasic alertness training: a novel behavioral therapy to improve spatial and non-spatial attention in patients with hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Joseph M Degutis; Thomas M Van Vleet
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  When connectedness increases hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Yanghua Tian; Yan Huang; Ke Zhou; Glyn W Humphreys; M Jane Riddoch; Kai Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neglect Patients Exhibit Egocentric or Allocentric Neglect for the Same Stimulus Contingent upon Task Demands.

Authors:  Louise-Ann Leyland; Hayward J Godwin; Valerie Benson; Simon P Liversedge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.