Literature DB >> 15591482

An in-service evaluation of hip protector use in residential homes.

Paul Thompson1, Carol Jones, Adrian Dawson, Peter Thomas, Tracy Villar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The establishment of a hip protector service has allowed us to study eligibility, acceptability and compliance with use, reasons for non-use, and the effect of dementia, confusion, incontinence and risk of falling.
METHODS: All residents in all residential homes in Poole were assessed at baseline. All eligible residents were offered 1 week's trial of protectors and those who wished to continue were given a set of protectors. Compliance was assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months. Percentages shown for compliance exclude those who died, were transferred, had lost data or in whom follow-up was not yet completed.
RESULTS: Over 18 months, 873 residents from 47 homes were identified (mean age 88 years, female:male 4.5:1). Of these, 745 were considered eligible to wear protectors (86%) and 535 agreed to wear them after 1 week (72%). Compliance over 12 months was 78%. Most wearers wore protectors every day. At 3 months, 83% of demented compared to 73% of not demented residents (P = 0.023), 86% of always confused, 77% of sometimes confused and 72% of never confused (P < 0.009) and 82% of incontinent compared to 73% of continent residents (P = 0.024) were wearing hip protectors. There was a positive linear trend between the risk of falling and compliance (P = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that there is a 48% chance of a resident wearing the protectors after 1 year. The higher compliance among those with dementia, confusion, incontinence and at high risk of falling supports the concept that hip protectors are worn by those at greatest risk of fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15591482     DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afh231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age Ageing        ISSN: 0002-0729            Impact factor:   10.668


  7 in total

1.  Autonomy, choice, patient-centered care, and hip protectors: the experience of residents and staff in long-term care.

Authors:  Joanie Sims-Gould; Heather A McKay; Fabio Feldman; Victoria Scott; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2013-06-11

2.  Predictors of uptake and adherence to the use of hip protectors among nursing-home residents.

Authors:  Hege Bentzen; Astrid Bergland; Lisa Forsén
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2008-08-22

3.  Availability and use of hip protectors in residents of nursing homes.

Authors:  J Klenk; S Kurrle; U Rissmann; A Kleiner; S Heinrich; H-H König; C Becker; K Rapp
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Follow-up for Alzheimer patients: European Alzheimer Disease Consortium position paper.

Authors:  F Nourhashémi; M G Olde Rikkert; A Burns; B Winblad; G B Frisoni; J Fitten; B Vellas
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 5.  [The role of hip protectors in the prevention of hip fractures in older people].

Authors:  Lukas A Holzer; Gerold Holzer
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2007

6.  Could a policy of provision of hip protectors to elderly nursing home residents result in cost savings in acute hip fracture care? The case of Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  A M Sawka; A Gafni; P Boulos; K Beattie; A Papaioannou; A Cranney; D A Hanley; J D Adachi; A Cheung; E A Papadimitropoulos; L Thabane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 5.071

7.  Validation and psychometric properties of the commitment to hip protectors (C-HiP) index in long-term care providers of British Columbia, Canada: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Alexandra M B Korall; Judith Godin; Fabio Feldman; Ian D Cameron; Pet-Ming Leung; Joanie Sims-Gould; Stephen N Robinovitch
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.921

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.